Hi Vincent, - packaging: I had already updated stable PPA to 16.04.1. For me the logics > behind PPAs is still relevant: master for dev version, testing for bugfix > as soon as they get out (16.04 branch for the moment), and stable for > releases (downloads not more than every month) >
How relevant are PPA's now that Snap is launched? > - Movit: just seen on forum that the lib is sensitive to localization: > https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=269&t=132764&p=358335#p358314 worth > a try!? > I see that in Shotcut Movit causes a lot of bugs, I think we should wait until it gets stable or add a warning to users. > - icons: that's really surprising that no script can do the job yet! What > is montel doing? ;) > Icons are messy still and this should be fixed for 16.08. We need to offer a similar interface experience across all platforms and between different distros. A packaging guideline should be established. > - site: I have no time for this; maybe I should handle the installation > part? (want to look at Flatpak!) > Yes,please join in :) What are your views? Snap, Flatpak or both? - wanted to add: Farid is asking for EDL for years... and Shotcut has just > integrated this feature! Maybe not so far for Kdenlive? > That would be a dream come true. I see Natron people have noticed this. Do you know which EDL stardard they use? Cheers -- 1111.1010.r.i.1101|n.o.i.s.1110|i.m.1010.g.1110|مقاومة fsf member #5439 usuario GNU/Linux #471966 |_|0|_| |_|_|0| |0|0|0| <a href="http://www.gunga.com.br">gunga</a> <a href="http://www.tempoecoarte.com.br">tempoecoarte</a> <a href="http://www.atelier-labs.org">atelier-labs</a> <a href="http://www.mocambos.net">rede mocambos</a>
_______________________________________________ kdenlive mailing list kdenlive@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdenlive