[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-11 Thread Bugs Bane
> Most distros have packages for Kdenlive 0.5, and I think it is safe to assume > that there also will be for the 0.7 release. It may take a few weeks, but I am > confident that If users ask their distro, packages will appear. That fast? I don't pretend to understand these things well. From wha

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-11 Thread Salvatore brigaglia
> Most distros have packages for Kdenlive 0.5, and I think it is safe to assume > that there also will be for the 0.7 release. It may take a few weeks, but I am > confident that If users ask their distro, packages will appear. > I think openSUSE's kdenlive 0.5 and 0.6svn comes from packman. I can

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-11 Thread jb
On Tuesday 11 November 2008 07.27:08 Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > > 1. Would I be correct in assuming that issues that require *developer* > > feedback rather than *user* feedback would be best left at > > "acknowledged"? I'm assuming this so that dev's can focus on just > > looking at Acknowled

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-11 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
tirsdag 11 November 2008 skrev Bugs Bane: > Oh Mighty Mantis-OverLord (tm), > > May your humble servant ask for your opinion (or that of anyone else > here) on a couple of things: Why do I get a feeling I am going to regret the overlord thing? :-) > > 1. Would I be correct in assuming that issu

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-10 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
mandag 10 November 2008 skrev Jean-Michel Pour?: > Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 ? 23:13 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg a ?crit : > > > > And as a more or less direct consequence of my self-appointed status > > as > > mantis-overload (all your bugs are belong to me), Cinephiliac > > (BugsBane) has > >

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-10 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 ? 23:13 +0100, Mads Bondo Dydensborg a ?crit : > > And as a more or less direct consequence of my self-appointed status > as > mantis-overload (all your bugs are belong to me), Cinephiliac > (BugsBane) has > agreed to be made an "updater" in mantis, and have already bee

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-10 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
fredag 31 Oktober 2008 skrev Mads Bondo Dydensborg: > Hi all Hi again I've had very little feedback (well, ok, I'll be honest, no feedback :-) on the list for this mail. I still think a policy is sort of needed. In the absence of feedback, I am going to act as if everybody agreed. (So, someone

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-11-10 Thread Bugs Bane
Oh Mighty Mantis-OverLord (tm), May your humble servant ask for your opinion (or that of anyone else here) on a couple of things: 1. Would I be correct in assuming that issues that require *developer* feedback rather than *user* feedback would be best left at "acknowledged"? I'm assuming this so

[Kdenlive-devel] Draft mantis policy - RFC

2008-10-31 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
Hi all As promised a draft for a mantis/issue tracking policy/guideline. Its a bit wordy, I am afraid. If you can't read it all, then perhaps have a look at the workflow diagram. I hope you care to read it and comment. The point is not to get facist about this, but rather to try and use Mantis