mandag 24 November 2008 skrev Alberto Villa:
> works fine! but i think that someone should emit projectModified() (if it's
> the name... well, the signal which activates the save button))... maybe
> setNewClipResource()?
Am I right in assuming that this functionality is now part of Kdenlive SVN,
works fine! but i think that someone should emit projectModified() (if it's
the name... well, the signal which activates the save button))... maybe
setNewClipResource()?
i've found another issue: in 0.6 document format, 's resource
isn't updated
i think it's related to the famous convertDocumen
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 01.08:14 Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:53:10 Alberto Villa wrote:
> > great news! thanks, i'm going on, so we'll have an example on which
> > debate
> >
> > :)
>
> here it is
> it's just a draft, as the name suggests, full of kdebug(), comments
On Sunday 23 November 2008 23:02:30 Alberto Villa wrote:
> just a question: why did you duplicate the code with the kmessagebox? and
> why does one of the entries contain a getopenfilename and not the other
> one? it's just for curiosity ;)
ok, latest commit was really explanatory :)
--
Alberto V
On Sunday 23 November 2008 22:51:27 jb wrote:
> Thanks for your patch. I finally took some time to look at it and
> integrated it with some changes in svn. I still have to work on the
> slideshows but otherwise seems to work fine.
great! i'm now going to test it
just a question: why did you duplic
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:53:10 Alberto Villa wrote:
> great news! thanks, i'm going on, so we'll have an example on which debate
> :)
here it is
it's just a draft, as the name suggests, full of kdebug(), comments and junk
code, but it works
it supports few things, only to show it is fast (
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:48:47 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> No, then there is no difference, no change to inigo required. :-)
great news! thanks, i'm going on, so we'll have an example on which debate :)
--
Alberto Villa
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:01:48 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> Yes, this would not be permitted to be integrated into inigo because I
> do not want to add the dependencies and UI; inigo needs to remain
> simple and be able to run headless. But kdenlive is free to not use
> inigo, the command line tool.
On Monday 17 November 2008 22:00:21 Dan Dennedy wrote:
> Seems rather complicated and potentially frought with issues. I am not
> opposed to it, and I try not to get too involved in kdenlive so I
> don't get too spread out. However, when this has to be handed off to
> rendering, then kdenlive might
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Alberto Villa
wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:01:48 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> Yes, this would not be permitted to be integrated into inigo because I
>> do not want to add the dependencies and UI; inigo needs to remain
>> simple and be able to run headless. But
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Alberto Villa
wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2008 22:00:21 Dan Dennedy wrote:
>> Seems rather complicated and potentially frought with issues. I am not
>> opposed to it, and I try not to get too involved in kdenlive so I
>> don't get too spread out. However, when
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Mads Bondo Dydensborg
wrote:
> fredag 14 November 2008 skrev Dan Dennedy:
>
>>
>> > Could you explain briefly what would be the use of the relative path
> feature ?
>>
>> Move the folder containing the project file and all of its assets to
>> another place or move
12 matches
Mail list logo
