Hello,
In the switch to KDE infrastructure, it was planned to transfer our Mantis BTS
to Bugzilla shared by all KDE components.
Transferring the existing database doesn't seem obvious as there are no
existing tools (up to date), no time and low motivation to do it: old entries
will be kept for
A clean break on the bug tracking system sounds good to me. Lots of old
bugs raised that are better forgotten about.
We can put the word out that if you raised a bug that still troubles you
then re-raise it in bugzilla.
I am honoured to make the list of assignees. I dunno what documentation
bugs
Hi,
> In Bugzilla we should define default assignees for each component, I
> proposed
> the following ones:
> - Installation (=> Vincent Pinon = vpinon)
> - User Interface (=> Jean-Baptiste Mardelle = jbm)
> - Video Display & Export (=> Jean-Baptiste Mardelle)
> -
Ok, Kdenlive is now available in bugs.kde.org, which is pointed to in
frameworks code.
I don't change it in master nor on website for the moment, if we want to keep
mantis for the KDE4 version.
Le mardi 6 janvier 2015, 22:30:45 Roger Morton a ?crit :
> I dunno what documentation bugs might appea
> Also, if you are doing infrastructure related stuff or have a
> contact with the KDE web admins, could you have a look a
> reviewboard.kde.org ? I think we should create a "kdenlive" group in the
> interface so that we are notified of incoming patches.
Done (thanks Ben)!
Re looking to the doco in the MLT/frei0r/LADSPA effects projects to
improve kdenlive doco.
I have kinda been down this path a bit already.
For example I already link to the MLT documentation for effects (Both
the MLT filters and the frei0r filters).
Trouble is the melt doco on the filters on which
