Re: Composite vs position and zoom

I faced another bug in position and zoom: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384628 Im only using transform now and converting the custom effects I had with position and zoom On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:21 PM, alberto fuentes wrote: > After messing with them a little bit, I

Re: Composite vs position and zoom

After messing with them a little bit, I have to say transform is better in almost every way to position and zoom unless im missing something obvious Transform even allows you to put the keyframes relatives to the end, which allows you to create custom effects for clip endings, allowing you to

Re: Composite vs position and zoom

Hi, Le 10/09/2017 à 23:33, farid abdelnour a écrit : > Also, hopefully this can get some attention for the next point release. ;) > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383426 My workaround was to use Add Effect > Crop and Transform > Transform instead (and ticking the "distort" check box).

Re: Composite vs position and zoom

Also, hopefully this can get some attention for the next point release. ;) https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383426 2017-09-10 18:30 GMT-03:00 farid abdelnour : > hi alberto > > 2017-09-10 9:05 GMT-03:00 alberto fuentes : > >> How are we supposed to

Re: Composite vs position and zoom

hi alberto 2017-09-10 9:05 GMT-03:00 alberto fuentes : > How are we supposed to move things on the screen? Are there advantages? > i can't really technically say which is better but *for me* position and zoom is what works best. basically +1 to what harald said. --

Re: Composite vs position and zoom

...@gmail.com> Datum: 10.09.17 14:05 (GMT+01:00) An: kdenlive@kde.org Betreff: Composite vs position and zoom How are we supposed to move things on the screen? Are there advantages?

Composite vs position and zoom

How are we supposed to move things on the screen? Are there advantages?