[Bug 288364] "Retrieving Folder Contents" hanging without showing content

2012-01-20 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288364 --- Comment #19 from2012-01-20 22:09:21 --- (In reply to comment #17) > additional info: > kmail has got no problem when accessing today's new mails. But just one click > on an older mail brings back the forever-hanging "retrieving folder content

[Bug 288364] "Retrieving Folder Contents" hanging without showing content

2012-01-11 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288364 --- Comment #14 from2012-01-11 19:27:26 --- I gave it the maximum number of votes. There must be *really* bad bugs in KMail if a bug as serious as this one is getting so little (visible) attention... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/u

[Bug 288364] "Retrieving Folder Contents" hanging without showing content

2011-12-24 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288364 --- Comment #6 from2011-12-24 22:18:54 --- Hi, Today I got the update of KDE 4.7.4 (and Linux (x86_64) release 3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64) and now KMail works fine again. So, I no longer have the problem of the bug under discussion. It also turned out

[Bug 289326] URL in about tab points to a page that has been removed.

2011-12-18 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289326 --- Comment #1 from2011-12-18 23:24:30 --- Now I made the same mistake... At Expected Results I intended to write: Pass the URL http://userbase.kde.org/KMail to the browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 289326] New: URL in about tab points to a page that has been removed.

2011-12-18 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289326 Summary: URL in about tab points to a page that has been removed. Product: kmail2 Version: 4.7 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug 288364] "Retrieving Folder Contents" hanging without showing content

2011-12-18 Thread dbjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288364 d...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@gmx.net --- Comment #5 from2011-12-1