subject:"\[Akonadi\] \[Bug 340614\] assertion failure in KIMAP\:\:ImapInterval\:\:setBegin"

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #12 from RJVB --- I'm not really familiar with IMAP UIDs, but what I gather from the original commit message is that they're not necessarily related to the actual number of messages in a folder. Indeed, it's quite suspicious that the error

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread Christian Mollekopf

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #11 from Christian Mollekopf --- (In reply to RJVB from comment #10) > PS: wouldn't it be of interest to know why this issue was triggered on a > GMail imap account, which AFAIK no longer provides Exchange features? The codepath is not exch

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #10 from RJVB --- PS: wouldn't it be of interest to know why this issue was triggered on a GMail imap account, which AFAIK no longer provides Exchange features? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #9 from RJVB --- Yes, I was beaten to it (or would have been if this were a race). In a RR I'd have pointed out that it isn't necessary to use a temp. variable, and that the 1st comment is a little off now, but the purpose is clear. Or so i

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread Christian Mollekopf

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 Christian Mollekopf changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-04 Thread Christophe Giboudeaux

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Giboudeaux --- didn't http://commits.kde.org/kdepim-runtime/af03ba2ba2390e2f114caa75d0e997900c456359 and http://commits.kde.org/kdepim-runtime/3e159c9e7bbb34301fa3616c9d6f8671a161a9f4 fix the same thing ? -- You are rece

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-03 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #6 from RJVB --- Seems I was right: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120967/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-03 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #5 from RJVB --- (In reply to Allen Winter from comment #3) > try reverting 94b64eebb6a88846b221aad810045fecb4173f79 in > kdepim-runtime/resources/imap > > I can try that myself tomorrow, but I'm leaving for the day. Anyway, I think that t

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-03 Thread RJVB

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #4 from RJVB --- What's the official way of doing such a revert? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https

[Akonadi] [Bug 340614] assertion failure in KIMAP::ImapInterval::setBegin

2014-11-03 Thread Allen Winter

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340614 --- Comment #3 from Allen Winter --- try reverting 94b64eebb6a88846b221aad810045fecb4173f79 in kdepim-runtime/resources/imap I can try that myself tomorrow, but I'm leaving for the day. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list f