[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2017-01-07 Thread Denis Kurz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 Denis Kurz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO

[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2016-09-24 Thread Denis Kurz via KDE Bugzilla
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 Denis Kurz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO Resolution|---

[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2013-02-19 Thread Christian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 --- Comment #4 from Christian --- Another observation: The filter considers two addresses as distinct, when they differ only in capitalisation. These should not be distinct. E.g. aku.an...@ankkalinna.fi is treated as not in the addressbook, when aku.an.

[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2013-02-18 Thread Christian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 --- Comment #3 from Christian --- Another observation on the cases when the filter adds a new contact with only a name, not an email address. This seems to happen when the "Display name" in the email shows with a comma. E.g., if the following is not in

[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2013-02-18 Thread Christian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 --- Comment #2 from Christian --- ...for some addresses, it does even stranger things. E.g. I received an email with CC to (changing the name here, but something like) Cc: James.TheSecond@Good-Old.England - the Email address is in my addressbook. The fi

[kmail2] [Bug 315319] kmail 4.9.5 filter "not in addressbook" does not read the whole address book

2013-02-17 Thread Christian
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315319 --- Comment #1 from Christian --- So far the best explanation I can come up with is that, for the filter condition to consider something "in the address book", both the email address as well as the name string in front of the email address have to match