Flex-id should be a better (easier to use and scales) than one member
classes and associated pools.
Regards
Francis Dupont
Phoebe Lee writes:
> --65328a0571c58502
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Sorry for bad wording!
> I'd like to have 1 IP reservation for a
Hi Thomas,
I am currently using 1.3 as well. The DDNS works great, though I found
there are some cases where the DDNS to powerdns fails to update the entry
if a previous one still exists. There does not seem to be any way to force
the update by overwriting the existing one, even though Kea knows
Hi Phoebe,
I considered the same idea for my lab, but I think it would require a hook
to do it properly. I allocate my addresses statically in the hosts
database, and I populate it with Ansible. I thought the flex-id hook would
accomplish this, but I have not had a chance to explore this.
Jason
Sorry for bad wording!
I'd like to have 1 IP reservation for a client-class that will only have 1
client in the class. Not sure if its possible.
I'm trying to have IP reservations based on port numbers of a device. I'm
passing port numbers of my device through Option-82 and classifying my end
Phoebe Lee writes:
> Wondering if there's a method of creating a reservation of a single IP
> based on client-classes instead of a pool.
=> I don't understand your question but in 1.4 you can guard a pool
with a client-class, i.e. only the client-class members can get an
address from the pool.
Hello all:
By way of update, Itay's problem was a minor configuration oversight. In his
kea-dhcp4 configuration file he was defining this:
"host-reservation-identifiers": [ "client-id" ],
when he needed to be defining this:
"host-reservation-identifiers": [ "flex-id" ],
Because he is
Hello Jim:
Currently, kea-dhcp4 does DNS updates if the client sends either the
Host Name or FQDN options in the REQUEST. If it sends both, the server
will use FQDN. Typically a client would issue a DISCOVER asking for the
Host Name, and then send it back in the REQUEST, or use it to
