On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Andre Carregal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas
> wrote:
> > Hmm, isn't it better to use the github bug tracker? Luaforge is kind
> > of in life support right now. :-)
>
> +1 for moving to github. OTOH http://luaforge.net/tracker/?group_
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Fabio Mascarenhas wrote:
> Hmm, isn't it better to use the github bug tracker? Luaforge is kind
> of in life support right now. :-)
+1 for moving to github. OTOH http://luaforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12
still contains some bugs and feature requests.
André
___
Hmm, isn't it better to use the github bug tracker? Luaforge is kind
of in life support right now. :-)
--
Fabio Mascarenhas
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Robert Calco
wrote:
> I spent some time today reviewing the code after nabbing it at github.
>
> My priorities are:
>
> 1. Dealing with kno
I spent some time today reviewing the code after nabbing it at github.
My priorities are:
1. Dealing with known issues that need resolution;
2. Updating/upgrading existing drivers on all supported platforms (mysql
5.1, postgres 9, etc.);
3. Expanding the range of databases supported and adding ne
