Re: Can we rename a principal yet?

2001-07-31 Thread Tom Yu
> "lindsey" == Christopher P Lindsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: lindsey> Yes, I know it's a FAQ, and yes, I know the key is (usually) lindsey> salted with the entire principal name. This still isn't quite possible yet through the kadm5 API; it is tentatively on our todo list for the next re

No Subject

2001-07-31 Thread don disco
hey, where can i get info on commands to checkout the kerberos source from cvs.? don _ For Rs. 2,000,000 worth of Aptech scholarships click below http://events.rediff.com/aptechsch/scholarship.htm

kerberos cvs

2001-07-31 Thread don disco
hey, where can i get info on commands to checkout the kerberos source from cvs.? don _ For Rs. 2,000,000 worth of Aptech scholarships click below http://events.rediff.com/aptechsch/scholarship.htm

Can we rename a principal yet?

2001-07-31 Thread Christopher P. Lindsey
Yes, I know it's a FAQ, and yes, I know the key is (usually) salted with the entire principal name. In my specific case, I'm only salting the key with the realm name since the instance for many of these principals will change at a later date. As an aside, is there any way to specify an alternati

Re: XP Client Trying to use Kerberos instead of SMB to Samba Server

2001-07-31 Thread Don Hiscock
But it works if we remove the samba server's host principal from active directory. Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Mayers, Philip J wrote: > > > Interesting - check the security policy on the machine. Windows *

security advisory: krb5 telnetd buffer overflows

2001-07-31 Thread Tom Yu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- KRB5 TELNETD BUFFER OVERFLOWS 2001-07-31 SUMMARY: Buffer overflows exist in the telnet daemon included with MIT krb5. Exploits are believed to exist for various operating systems on at least the i386 architecture. IMPACT: If telnetd is r

RE: XP Client Trying to use Kerberos instead of SMB to Samba Server

2001-07-31 Thread Gerald Carter
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Mayers, Philip J wrote: > Interesting - check the security policy on the machine. Windows *should* be > able to detect that you're talking to a non-Kerberised SMB server and > downgrade. Have you tried it against an NT4 server, for example? The same > thing *should* happen. >

RE: failing make install on Solaris

2001-07-31 Thread Don Fike
Hello, I am running the install as myself, not root. I have a feeling this line is what causes the error; if test -n "$f" ; then /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c -s -m 4755 -o root $f <-- (more output below) However I can't find where this is being issued, any ideas? Thanks, Don Fike [EMA

Re: failing make install on Solaris

2001-07-31 Thread Mitchell E Berger
> I am running the install as myself, not root. I have a feeling this line is > what causes the error; > > > if test -n "$f" ; then /usr/local/gnu/bin/install -c -s -m 4755 -o root $f You are correct that this line is the one causing you problems, but the line itself is correct. You must ru

RE: XP Client Trying to use Kerberos instead of SMB to Samba Server

2001-07-31 Thread Mayers, Philip J
Interesting - check the security policy on the machine. Windows *should* be able to detect that you're talking to a non-Kerberised SMB server and downgrade. Have you tried it against an NT4 server, for example? The same thing *should* happen. Very interesting - I'd be curious to know what securit

RE: unsubscribe

2001-07-31 Thread Furmaniuk, Michael
unsubscribe

Spam Messages

2001-07-31 Thread Oliver Egginger
Could someone block this spam messages (w95vgd), please... -- Oliver Egginger FH Giessen-Friedberg DV-Zentrum Wiesenstrasse 14 35390 Giessen Tel. +49 641 309-1283 Fax +49 641 309-2908 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sprechzeiten des DV-Zentrums fue

Unavailability of wdr.com

2001-07-31 Thread Alana . Thompson
Dear Recipient, It has been noticed that you have been receiving internal e-mails addressed to you at the @wdr.com internet address. On 31st August 2001, this internet address will no longer be applicable to the bank, and you will therefore not receive the e-mail. Please ensure that any peo

Unavailability of wdr.com

2001-07-31 Thread Alana . Thompson
Dear Recipient, It has been noticed that you have been receiving internal e-mails addressed to you at the @wdr.com internet address. On 31st August 2001, this internet address will no longer be applicable to the bank, and you will therefore not receive the e-mail. Please ensure that any peo

unsubscribe

2001-07-31 Thread Anita Simpson