rsync is a good idea, but as far as i can see from
http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/kwc/krb5.load.txt
it takes a lot more time to load the database then to send it over the
network.
And with rsync you still have this problem.
Klaas
- Original Message -
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL
Erik Arneson wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm new to the list and to Kerberos, so I apologize if this is a FAQ.
In my rather brief amount of reading, I've gotten the impression that
Kerberos uses DES encryption for the network-based authentication. As
DES is relatively insecure, is there any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Srinivas Cheruku) wrote in message
news:E0315628431FD611BB4300C04F1523769A3547@BG1MAIL...
When i want to get a ticket by kinit,such as kinit -f test,Ii can
get a ticket.but when i telnet the telnet server machine
10.30.10.56,through telnet -a -f -x 10.30.10.56, ,it tell
Apr 10 16:39:27 10.30.10.56 krb5kdc[856](info): AS_REQ
10.30.10.56(88): ISSUE: authtime 1018427967, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 10 16:39:50 10.30.10.56 krb5kdc[856](info): TGS_REQ
10.30.10.56(88): UNKNOWN_SERVER: authtime 1018427967,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL
Hi,
where can i get ssh server and client supporting
kerberos auth for linux?
i apologize if this is a faq, but i haven't found
anything.
thanks
klaas
The TELNET AUTH and TELNET AUTH KRB5 option negotiations are
specified in RFC 2941 and RFC 2942. They can be accessed from
the RFC Editor's page http://www.rfc-editor.org and I keep
copies of them along with my latest Internet-Drafts at
http://www.kermit-project.org/standards.html
In article
cg2v == Chaskiel M Grundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cg2v He's not talking about msg_control/msg_accrights, but msg_name,
cg2v which irix 6.5 claims to support:
cg2v
cg2v struct msghdr {
cg2vcaddr_t msg_name; /* optional address */
cg2vint
ok, i got openssh and two patches, one for gssapi
and one for kerberos.
i patched both succesfully and was able to make a
new configure-file
i configured and compiled it successfully with
krb5-support (--with-krb5)
and i can start the servrer successfully.
Then i try to use ssh and get
?
It seems something has changed where you can no longer issue:
$ listprincs luser
You will get nothing back. If you issue:
$ listprincs luser*
You get potential several.
and finally if you:
$ listprincs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could somebody give me some info or
What is the correct way to do this? Or is it correct to allow both?
And should an option be added to SomeNewSSH to allow either
functionality (-k1 kerberos original -k2 extra principal...)?
Openssh-3.1p1 uses the default principal is the same as the client and
things seem to be compatable as
March 28,
2002
BCDWest Home Laserjet
Toner InkJet
Cartridges Copier/Fax
Accessories
Dear Educator,
We have
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Grady):
|What is the correct way to do this? Or is it correct to allow both?
| And should an option be added to SomeNewSSH to allow either
| functionality (-k1 kerberos original -k2 extra principal...)?
| Openssh-3.1p1 uses the default principal is the same as
12 matches
Mail list logo