2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
The associated detached PGP signature is at:
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt.asc
I find that the PGP signature doesn't verify. Is anyone
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:19:33AM -0700, Mike Friedman wrote:
2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
The associated detached PGP signature is at:
*** WARNING ***
I'm going to start an exchange to try to determine whether Mike has the
correct bits and why he can't verify the signature. It should be noted
that this entire exchange is occuring over unprotected email, and so it is
a bad idea to rely on statements made by either of us like
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 at 13:44 (-0300), Andreas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 08:19:33AM -0700, Mike Friedman wrote:
2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
The associated detached PGP signature is at:
Hi,
I have this problem with kpasswd. I can't seem to get it to function
properly. I always get the following dialog:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kpasswd
Password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Enter new password: :
Enter it again: :
kpasswd: Connection timed out changing password
I've googled all over the
No, although an explanation of why the problem is hard and why in
general you may not be able to solve it is in
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications (successor to RFC 1510).
Thanks for the pointer... I have now found: Encryption and Checksum
Specifications for Kerberos 5
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Mike Friedman wrote:
I have no trouble verifying the asn1 (MITKRB5-SA-2004-003) patch with PGP.
Why can't I get -002 to verify?
Any other ideas? I'm doing this on Solaris 8, using PGP 6.5.8.
Well, I'm using gnupg. Perhaps there is some
That's all the ever appears in the log. I have the kadmin log
segregated and nothing ever shows up in that log during this
opperation. I thought the kadmind daemon was responsible for this but
it never gets involved from what I can tell.
Here's the problem: the admin server will _not_
On 01-Sep-2004, Mike Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt
The associated detached PGP signature is at:
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/2004-002-patch_1.2.7.txt.asc
I'm new to the list, I did download the archive and search it, but I didn't
find anything that pointed me towards this. I'm hoping someone can help, or
maybe give me some feedback on more troubleshooting steps.
I'm running Aurora 1.0 (Redhat 7.x for SPARC platforms) and I have attempted
to
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 07:20:00 -0700 Frank Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, although an explanation of why the problem is hard and why in
general you may not be able to solve it is in
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications (successor to RFC 1510).
Thanks for the pointer... I
--On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 17:25:59 + Mike Friedman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no trouble verifying the asn1 (MITKRB5-SA-2004-003) patch with PGP.
Why can't I get -002 to verify?
Any other ideas? I'm doing this on Solaris 8, using PGP 6.5.8.
It appears as though pgp 6 does
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 at 15:00 (-0400), Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
It appears that gnupg removes trailing blanks from every line, and pgp6
does not. The following scriptlet will convert one of these patch files
into a form that pgp 6.5.8/linux is able to verify for me:
perl -ne
13 matches
Mail list logo
