On Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:12:12 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:53:33PM -0600, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:24:24PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:02:54AM -0600,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:58:39PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:12:12 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams wrote:
The last two supplementary groups add up to a PAG thing? That won't
go over well :)
Actually, that's what AFS does, except it's the _first_ two groups;
On Thursday, March 30, 2006 06:08:10 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:58:39PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2006 04:12:12 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams wrote:
The last two supplementary groups add up to a PAG thing? That
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:02:14PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2006 06:08:10 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh? Why should UIDs not conflict with PAGs? What am I missing?
Because AFS identifies credentials, cached connections, and cached
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:12:50PM -0500, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Thursday, March 30, 2006 07:41:05 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the kernel doesn't need PAGs for itself -- it upcalls to daemons
that do (e.g., gssd(1M)) and which can use door_ucred(3DOOR)
Dear Kerberos Team:
My name is Brian McInnis and I am working with California State
Assemblywoman Lois Wolk to push AB 2191, a bill asking the Secretary of
State to create a pilot program to test the internet security protocol
necessary to register a person to vote (validate an affidavit)
Hey all,
I'm trying to configure a Solaris 9 server to authenticate against an
Win 2000 ADS server with mixed results and was looking for some
insight.
So here's the thing; Once logged in, I can run kinit and aquire a
ticket:
# kinit
Password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#
