Re: unix active directory

2006-08-14 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Shawn, Active Directory is the name of Microsoft's KDC/LDAP server. So there's no such thing as Active Directory server on linux. You could setup a KDC (MIT, Heimdal, etc) or an LDAP server (OpenLDAP, Fedora Directory Server) on your Linux machine

AD, pam and Kerberos?

2006-08-14 Thread JK (Jesper Agerbo Krogh)
Hi All. We have a setup with several Active Directory domains that individually trusts each other. Each domain translates into each own Kerberos REALM as far as I'm understanding the systems. But prinicipals are unique across the realms. Thus if [EMAIL PROTECTED] exixts, then It doesn't

Re: AD, pam and Kerberos?

2006-08-14 Thread Luke Howard
You could try one of the commercial products such as VAS (Quest) or DirectControl (Centrify). I believe they both have quite good support for multiple domains. -- Luke -- Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu

Re: AD, pam and Kerberos?

2006-08-14 Thread Douglas E. Engert
JK (Jesper Agerbo Krogh) wrote: Hi All. We have a setup with several Active Directory domains that individually trusts each other. Each domain translates into each own Kerberos REALM as far as I'm understanding the systems. Yes. But prinicipals are unique across the realms. Thus

Re: Problems with kpropd

2006-08-14 Thread Juliet Kemp
Mike Dopheide wrote: Hhmm.. okay. First of all, you don't want to have the same keys in krb5.keytab on both systems. A system should really only have keys for itself and any services it provides (like host/hostname, ftp/hostname, etc). Ah, right, OK. Misapprehension there on my part;

Re: PAM hangs after authenticating against 2003 AD

2006-08-14 Thread Jesper Angelo
Additional info: Local login works using pam_unix... Even if I put pam_unix to be optional (ie all passwords are accepted) it works - except if I put in the right password from the AD. So its something with the kerberos process in pam_krb5... j-

Re: MITKRB-SA-2006-001: multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities

2006-08-14 Thread Sachin Punadikar
Hi Tom, I implemented the changes suggested by you for MIT krb5 Security Advisory 2006-001 in the ksu utility. I am always observing below message when I exit from the ksu shell. I tested it on AIX and Linux. Behavior is same. -- # ksu tester Changing uid

Re: MITKRB-SA-2006-001: multiple local privilege escalation vulnerabilities

2006-08-14 Thread Tom Yu
Sachin == Sachin Punadikar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sachin Hi Tom, Sachin I implemented the changes suggested by you for MIT krb5 Security Advisory Sachin 2006-001 in the ksu utility. I am always observing below message when I Sachin exit from the ksu shell. I tested it on AIX and Linux.

Kerberos Infection

2006-08-14 Thread Cris Smith
To Whom it may concern: I suspect the use of a Kerberos infestation through an addressable worm. I would need to research the known worm, but I have found the origin to be a doc file from an archive set, dating back to early versions of word. The ultimate effect was the destabilization of a

AW: AW: Validation with Kerberos 5, SAP Linux, SNC for SSO

2006-08-14 Thread Devulapally, Santosh (RyTull)
Hello Calin, I was trying to follow your documentation to configure SSO on SAP R/3 on Aix to Windows AD, using BC-SNC adapter and Kerberos. I got the following error message in work process trace files. If you could give me any leads I will appreciate it. SncInit(): found