Russ,
yes I use MIT 1.3.1. I'll try your suggestion.
Thanks
Markus
"Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Markus Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to
>> have users from either domain
The saga of 1.5.1 continues with me on AIX. Using CC ( XLC/XLC++ 8.0 )
on AIX 5.3, I am now getting this error:
making all in lib/rpc/unit-test...
Target "all" is up to date.
cc -I../../../include -I./../../../include -I.
-DKRB5_DEPRECATED=1 -DKRB5_PRIVATE=1 -D_
LARGE_FILES -DLANL -D
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 00:32 +0100, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 17:36 -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> > If
> > the PAM library does dlopen and dlclose on loaded modules, there may
> > also be some kind of problem in that area.
>
> Indeed, that may be the closest I've come to the tr
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 17:36 -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2006, at 14:25, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> > great fandango all over libkrb5's core, they all occur in the Kerberos
> > library, in incidents seemingly related to the error tables. The usual
> > backtrace looks like this:
> > [...]
> The
On Dec 14, 2006, at 14:25, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I'm experiencing weird segfaults in a program I've written. While I
> cannot exactly prove that it isn't my own fault and I'm not just
> doing a
> great fandango all over libkrb5's core, they all occur in the Kerberos
> library, in i
"Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Markus Moeller wrote:
>
>> "Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>>Markus Moeller wrote:
>>>
>>>
Russ,
I have a setup where I have two domains wi
Markus Moeller wrote:
> "Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>>Markus Moeller wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Russ,
>>>
>>>I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to have
>>>users from either domain to login to my Unix machine to appl
"Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Markus Moeller wrote:
>
>> Russ,
>>
>> I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to have
>> users from either domain to login to my Unix machine to applications
>> which
>> can't use GSS
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
> Markus Moeller wrote:
>
>
>>Russ,
>>
>>I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to have
>>users from either domain to login to my Unix machine to applications which
>>can't use GSSAPI so I need to use pam_krb5 to have some form of SSO. My
"Christopher D. Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >From the manual page:
> http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/pam-krb5/pam-krb5.html
>
> realm=
> "If the obtained credentials are supposed to allow access to a shell
> account, the user will need an appropria
Markus Moeller wrote:
> Russ,
>
> I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to have
> users from either domain to login to my Unix machine to applications which
> can't use GSSAPI so I need to use pam_krb5 to have some form of SSO. My Unix
> system is in DOMAIN1.COM whic
>From the manual page:
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/pam-krb5/pam-krb5.html
realm=
"If the obtained credentials are supposed to allow access to a shell
account, the user will need an appropriate .k5login file entry or the
system will have to have a custom aname_to_localname mapping. "
Do
Hi list!
I'm experiencing weird segfaults in a program I've written. While I
cannot exactly prove that it isn't my own fault and I'm not just doing a
great fandango all over libkrb5's core, they all occur in the Kerberos
library, in incidents seemingly related to the error tables. The usual
backtr
Russ,
I have a setup where I have two domains with trust and would like to have
users from either domain to login to my Unix machine to applications which
can't use GSSAPI so I need to use pam_krb5 to have some form of SSO. My Unix
system is in DOMAIN1.COM which is configured to be the default dom
Confirmed here.
The first message that I see on the MIT list that does not appear in
comp.protocols.kerberos is:
Message-ID: <45551A2D.7040803 at cablecar.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:32:45 -0800
From: Bob Jaques
Organization: Cablecar.net
To: kerberos at mit.edu, samba at lists.samba.org
Subj
Thanks
Markus
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
16 matches
Mail list logo
