Re: KDC TGS_REQ ticket expired log message has no client or server info

2011-08-08 Thread Chris Hecker
I assume you mean krb5_rd_req_decoded would set the ticket output value in cases where it decrypts and decodes successfully but doesn't validate? Yeah, and the caller would be responsible for calling krb5_free_enc_tkt_part if the ticket is non-null instead of it being called in cleanup: at

Re: how to ban clients?

2011-08-08 Thread Chris Hecker
Obviously any real refactor of kdc code is something way out of scope/expertise for me to do (I only changed the silly pass-giant-struct-by-value thing and fixed the dupe struct), but I did docs for the new profile vars and whatnot. The change is pretty trivial in terms of lines of code,

Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Martin Hochreiter
Hi! I just want to ask if somebody got firefox working with kerberos proxy authentication? We use IronPort Proxies in our company that authenticate against the Active Directory, so every windows machine can logon to the proxy without credentials with firefox, but I dont get firefox

AW: Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Schreiber Martin
Hello, Pls check the following: 1. In the browse URL Line insert about:config 2. accept the warning blabla 3.then search for string nego 4.go for string: network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris; and change it to your domain.your_domain.at Should work now Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Re: Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Martin Hochreiter
Am 2011-08-08 13:48, schrieb Schreiber Martin: Hello, Pls check the following: 1. In the browse URL Line insert about:config 2. accept the warning blabla 3.then search for string nego 4.go for string: network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris; and change it to your domain

Re: max size for ap-req and ap-rep?

2011-08-08 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 8/8/2011 12:38 AM, Greg Hudson wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 03:13 -0400, Chris Hecker wrote: Is there a max size for the AP-REQ and AP-REP packets? Even a conservative (eg. never 768 bytes) would be fine. If you are using Windows AD for the KDC, the authdata Greg refers to below

RE: Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM)
We have also leveraged network.automatic, for single sign-on scenarios. Set network.automatic‐ntlm‐auth.trusted‐uris value to “server1.domain.com” (double click to set) Set network.negotiate‐auth.trusted‐uris value to “server1.domain.com” (double click to set) -Original Message- From:

Re: Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Martin Hochreiter
Am 2011-08-08 15:46, schrieb Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM): We have also leveraged network.automatic, for single sign-on scenarios. Set network.automatic‐ntlm‐auth.trusted‐uris value to “server1.domain.com” (double click to set) Set network.negotiate‐auth.trusted‐uris value to “server1.domain.com”

RE: Firefox Proxy Kerberos

2011-08-08 Thread Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM)
Depending on your needs, NTLM can provide a single sign-on configuration. If Kerberos is your preference, due to security, then a Firefox browser configuration cannot provide that, as you said. -Original Message- From: Martin Hochreiter [mailto:linux...@wavenet.at] Sent: Monday,

Re: how to ban clients?

2011-08-08 Thread Greg Hudson
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 04:09 -0400, Chris Hecker wrote: I'm not sure of the best way to write an automated test for this. Is there an example of a complex test like this in the source tree? We have a test framework in util/k5test.py which takes care of the heavy lifting. You can find

Performance issues with krb5-1.9.1

2011-08-08 Thread Jonathan Reams
We recently upgraded our primary KDC from 1.8.3 to 1.9.1, and within a few hours, performance was so bad that we had to roll back. We're running a plain vanilla instance of kerberos, supporting a variety of clients (versions spanning 1.4-1.8). From the perspective of the KDC, there wasn't any

Re: Performance issues with krb5-1.9.1

2011-08-08 Thread Greg Hudson
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 11:22 -0400, Jonathan Reams wrote: I did some performance testing on our test KDC and was able to reproduce the performance issue with 1.9.1. I found a regression which would affect these tests, but I'm not sure it accounts for your global performance issues. The KDC in