Hi Bryce,
> I may be asking a question which exposes either my ignorance or lack
> of imagination, but is there a reason a kx509 (RFC6717/RFC4556)
> certificate wouldn't work? Wouldn't it be easier to add support for
> these previously defined extensions?
>
I'm happy to answer that of course; but
"Paul B. Henson" writes:
> We currently have two kerberos realms, each consisting of three systems
> (1 physical box and 2 virtual machines). For a while now we've been
> having an issue where once a day, almost exactly every 24 hours, the two
> physical boxes have a latency spike and don't respo
We currently have two kerberos realms, each consisting of three systems
(1 physical box and 2 virtual machines). For a while now we've been
having an issue where once a day, almost exactly every 24 hours, the two
physical boxes have a latency spike and don't respond to authentication
requests, to t
