Re: Kerberos n00b question.

2019-01-10 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
From: kerberos-boun...@mit.edu on behalf of Robbie Harwood Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:18 PM To: Grant Taylor; kerberos@mit.edu Subject: Re: Kerberos n00b question. Grant Taylor writes: >> You don't have to recreate them, but yes, it's a good idea to set >> +requires_preauth. Setting

Re: Kerberos n00b question.

2019-01-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Grant Taylor writes: > On 1/8/19 6:02 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> Also! 2FA will mitigate this concern somewhat as well. > > I was wondering about 2nd factor authentication. I have a YubiKey > that's waiting for my attention. > > Would I be correct in assuming that (from a Kerberos point of

Re: Kerberos n00b question.

2019-01-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Grant Taylor writes: > On 1/8/19 6:02 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> It still reduces to the security of a password (the one locking the >> random key). > > I agree that the passwords are the weakest link. But I thought > (hoped) that it would bolster the strength of the (derived) key that > Ke

Re: Kerberos n00b question.

2019-01-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Russ Allbery writes: > Robbie Harwood writes: > >> Also! 2FA will mitigate this concern somewhat as well. krb5 is >> prepared to hand off to a RADIUS responder for OTP (freeIPA uses >> this, which I know you're not interested in but is meaningful as a >> PoC); you can then use something like f