On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:11:38AM -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >> Heh. You see why I choose to make xlock use the Kerberos call directly?
> >
> >Yep -- were these patches submitted to the XFree86 xlock or xlockmore?
> >Where could I find them?
>
> xlockmore; if you go to the xlockmore site and
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:52:12PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> I'm getting ready to propose the use of Kerberos in our division.
> I've done some reading up on the subject and in general I like what I
> see. However, I have this nagging thought in my head that my
> management and some of the network wee
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 02:19:00PM +0100, Christian wrote:
> ""D J"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I will get hold of this book now.Thanks.
> > I came acorss SASL while reading kerberos papers.what is SASL?
> > Where to get d
just some more info on this... i just grabbed the Kens monsterpatch,
stripped out everything except for the server_dict.c diff, and applied it
to server_dict.c from the latest MIT (that I just grabbed a moment ago).
Every hunk applied successfully. After applying the patch, if you dont mind
havin
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:57:02PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >Well I tried to hack server_dict.c with crack lib and when attempting
> >to change a password kadmind dies. So I grabed the patch for
> >server_dict out of the monster-patch for afs-krb5 and applied it, and
> >got the same results.
point me to where this change took place
in the codebase? Apparently the original behaviour (the first one above)
still works that way in the 1.2.3 code, but not in the 1.2.4 code.
Enlighten me please. This is a problem for me at the moment.
-ray
--
Raymond M. Schneider
