Message-
From: Ken Raeburn [mailto:raeb...@mit.edu]
Sent: 12 Nov 2009 19:07
To: Kemna, Leon H. (M Risk)
Cc: Kerberos mailing list
Subject: Re: Assertion failed for krb5kdc
On Nov 12, 2009, at 07:57,
wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> I'm following your thread on mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerbe
On Nov 12, 2009, at 07:57,
wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> I'm following your thread on mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos,
> october
> 19 20:46:20
Check the messages from November -- Tom Shaw pointed this out too, and
I tracked down the problem.
There's also an entry in the bug database now, includi
On Nov 12, 2009, at 07:57,
wrote:
> Maybe you're refering to a more recent repository version?
> Is there a version that I could download which would yield better
> results on solaris 8 for compilation?
Oh, and regarding Solaris 8... I'd forgotten when I sent my earlier
email, but there are a
Hi Ken,
I'm following your thread on mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos, october
19 20:46:20
You mention a part of the configure script to detect the solaris
version:
case "${host_os}" in
[...]
solaris2.[1-9])
# On Solaris 10 with gcc 3.4.3, the autoconf archive macro
doesn't
On Nov 8, 2009, at 22:33, Tom Shaw wrote:
> I hadthe same problem on Solaris 9. I just downloaded the latest
> krb5-1.7-signed.tar (http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/krb5/1.7/
> krb5-1.7-signed.tar) and the configure script is not quite the same as
> you have listed.
>
> Instead of:
> solaris2.
On Oct 20, 8:46 am, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2009, at 16:55, eightball wrote:
>
> >> This would be dependent on some configuration macros,
> >> HAVE_PRAGMA_WEAK_REF and NO_WEAK_PTHREADS; can you see which are set
> >> in include/autoconf.h in the build tree? The former should be
> >> d
I am having this problem on Solaris 9 Sparc as well from a fresh set of
source files.
Ref: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2009-October/015426.html
Is there a fix for the configure? How to get this work compile properly on
a solaris 9 sparc system?
_
On Oct 19, 2009, at 16:55, eightball wrote:
>> This would be dependent on some configuration macros,
>> HAVE_PRAGMA_WEAK_REF and NO_WEAK_PTHREADS; can you see which are set
>> in include/autoconf.h in the build tree? The former should be
>> defined
>> (based on tests of the compiler, so it may
On Oct 19, 2:29 pm, Ken Raeburn wrote:
>
> Okay, it looks like it's never even calling krb5int_pthread_loaded,
> which should mean that it's always following the code path (in
> selecting macro definitions) that assumes the thread support is always
> linked in. This would be dependent on s
On Oct 16, 2009, at 19:19, eightball wrote:
> I am not familiar with gdb. If I did it incorrectly, some help would
> be appreciated:
No, it looks right...
> (gdb) run -n
> Starting program: /local/BuildArea/krb5/krb5-1.7/src/kdc/krb5kdc -n
>
> Breakpoint 1, main (argc=2, argv=0xffbef934) at main.
On Oct 16, 12:28 am, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> Yes... on Solaris it ought to be using the code paths that call
> krb5int_pthread_loaded in the support library. Among other things,
> that function may call pthread_once a couple of times, and the
> function passed (loaded_test_aux) will adjust a
On Oct 15, 2009, at 19:20, Tom Yu wrote:
> eightball writes:
>
>> I am having the same problem with Solaris 8 and 9, but not 10. The
>> output is the same between 8 and 9, so I am just sending 8.
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Steve
>
> A comment in k5-thread.h implies that Solaris < 10 have a broken
I came across the klogind error since I am producing this for client
machines not KDCs. I went back and checked the packages that were
created for 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 and they both exhibit the same problem
with krb5kdc. However at that time, the klogind binary worked fine.
I poked at it some more and
eightball writes:
> I am having the same problem with Solaris 8 and 9, but not 10. The
> output is the same between 8 and 9, so I am just sending 8.
> Thanks for your help,
> Steve
A comment in k5-thread.h implies that Solaris < 10 have a broken
pthread_once() that doesn't actually do anything.
I am having the same problem with Solaris 8 and 9, but not 10. The
output is the same between 8 and 9, so I am just sending 8.
Thanks for your help,
Steve
[r...@localhost]/local/BuildArea/krb5/krb5-1.7/src#gdb kdc/krb5kdc
GNU gdb 5.3
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free softwa
On Oct 8, 2009, at 02:19, Mohammad, Meraj wrote:
> Kerberos 5 release 1.7". I am always getting assertion failure and
> program is aborted.
> I am not getting a stack trace and i have no idea, how to get stack
> trace.
Do you know how to use gdb?
Something like this sequence of commands should wor
PM
To: Mohammad, Meraj
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: Re: Assertion failed for krb5kdc
"Mohammad, Meraj" writes:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> When I tried to execute below command in sun Solaris operation
> system(version 9). Why I am getting Assertion fail error.
>
> /usr/
"Mohammad, Meraj" writes:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> When I tried to execute below command in sun Solaris operation
> system(version 9). Why I am getting Assertion fail error.
>
> /usr/local/sbin/krb5kdc
>
> Assertion failed: k5int_i->did_run != 0, file krb5_libinit.c, line 63
>
>
>
> But /usr/local/sbi
Hi,
When I tried to execute below command in sun Solaris operation
system(version 9). Why I am getting Assertion fail error.
/usr/local/sbin/krb5kdc
Assertion failed: k5int_i->did_run != 0, file krb5_libinit.c, line 63
But /usr/local/sbin/kadmind command working fine for me .
Please
19 matches
Mail list logo
