Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-25 Thread Douglas E. Engert
BarBaar wrote: Hello, Today I started to sniff the network, while trying to setup aan cross-realm kerberos-session... (realm named: test.nl and tester.test.nl) You have lost me here. What is the W2k3 AD domain name and what is the MIT KDC realm name? Yesterday there where TEST.NL (AD) and TEST2.NL

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-25 Thread BarBaar
Hello, Today I started to sniff the network, while trying to setup aan cross-realm kerberos-session... (realm named: test.nl and tester.test.nl) And the sniffer (ethereal) did not tell me very much.. But he did tell me the WinXp client is requesting a TGS from the w2k3 AD KDC (which is good!). An

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-25 Thread Douglas E. Engert
BarBaar wrote: Hi all, I took a little step backward today. First I tried to acces a Debian telnet service with a WinXP client, and a Windows 2003 server KDC. This was no problem (the client is a member of the 2003 domain). The next step was to authenticate on a MIT KDC with the WinXP client. The

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-22 Thread BarBaar
Hi all, I took a little step backward today. First I tried to acces a Debian telnet service with a WinXP client, and a Windows 2003 server KDC. This was no problem (the client is a member of the 2003 domain). The next step was to authenticate on a MIT KDC with the WinXP client. The WinXP client n

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-21 Thread Douglas E. Engert
BarBaar wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Douglas E. Engert") wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... So let me get this straight. You have two realms, TEST.NL (AD) and TEST2.NL MIT based. The user is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The workstation i.e. server in this case is XP box with pricipal host/[EMAIL PROT

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-21 Thread BarBaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Douglas E. Engert") wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > So let me get this straight. You have two realms, TEST.NL (AD) > and TEST2.NL MIT based. > > The user is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The workstation i.e. server in this case is XP box with pricipal > host/[EMAIL PROT

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-21 Thread swbell
in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], BarBaar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/20/04 3:57 AM: > Hi, > > I am testing a setup with cross realm authentication. I know that > there are several documents describing this setup, but none of them > work for me. I followed the instructions of MS Interoperatebili

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-21 Thread Jeffrey Altman
BarBaar wrote: > Hi, > > I found the following message on my w2k3 AD: > > 10/21/200411:48:35 AM KerberosError None3 N/A BART > "A Kerberos > Error Message was received: > on logon session > Client Time: > Server Time: 9:48:35. 10/21/2004 Z > E

Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-20 Thread BarBaar
Hi, I am testing a setup with cross realm authentication. I know that there are several documents describing this setup, but none of them work for me. I followed the instructions of MS Interoperatebility guide, and the guidelines in O'Reilly's Definite Guide to Kerberos. I am using MS Server 2003

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-20 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Make sure that the only key type you have for the trust in the MIT KDC for your cross realm principals are DES-CBC-MD5 and RC4-HMAC. (RC4-HMAC requires 2003 SP1 beta). BarBaar wrote: Hi, I am testing a setup with cross realm authentication. I know that there are several doc

Re: Cross realm auth with MS Server 2003 and MIT kerb

2004-10-20 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Make sure that the only key type you have for the trust in the MIT KDC for your cross realm principals are DES-CBC-MD5 and RC4-HMAC. (RC4-HMAC requires 2003 SP1 beta). BarBaar wrote: > Hi, > > I am testing a setup with cross realm authentication. I know that > there are several documents descri