OK. So it seems I am not so only one who is puzzled abput it.
Thanks
Markus
"Ken Raeburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:53, Markus Moeller wrote:
>> Are the kftp, kftp-data, ktelnet port assignments 6621,6620 and 6623
>> referenced in any rfc
On Nov 1, 2006, at 12:53, Markus Moeller wrote:
> Are the kftp, kftp-data, ktelnet port assignments 6621,6620 and 6623
> referenced in any rfc ?
I see them in the IANA assignments, but I think this is the first
I've heard of them.
It looks like they were registered by Robert Scott a bit over a
>Are the kftp, kftp-data, ktelnet port assignments 6621,6620 and 6623
>referenced in any rfc ?
AFAIK, the answer to that is "no".
Why are they there? Well, the short answer is: firewall administrators
are stupid.
--Ken
Kerberos mailing list
Are the kftp, kftp-data, ktelnet port assignments 6621,6620 and 6623
referenced in any rfc ?
Thanks
Markus
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
