Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:38:47 AM +0100 Turbo Fredriksson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security? Nah, both need _extra ordinary security_ so it's easier to
safegard ONE machine than two (* nr of slaves of course :).
On the contrary,
Quoting Nicolas Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:04:08PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
The LDAP server is nowhere NEAR as important. If they crack that,
all they'll get is ... what, nothing basically?
Depends on who's relying on the LDAP server and for what.
If
On Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:38:47 AM +0100 Turbo Fredriksson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security? Nah, both need _extra ordinary security_ so it's easier to
safegard ONE machine than two (* nr of slaves of course :).
On the contrary, depending on what you are using your LDAP directory
Quoting Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
actually, i was thinking of two separate machines one for the KDC
and the other for the OpenLDAP, i read an article that suggests the
separation to avoid to secure the KDC.
To avoid securing the KDC!?!? Sorry, but whoever wrote that must be
drunk (or know
so sorry i didn't mean that, i mean to secure not to avoid to secure (so sorry!)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Turbo Fredriksson
Sent: Sun 1/8/2006 2:04 PM
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: Re: KDC Hardware
Quoting Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
actually
Quoting Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
so sorry i didn't mean that, i mean to secure not to avoid to secure (so
sorry!)
Ah, that explains a lot :)
But you should keep the LDAP server (just as) safe as well. As
I said in the mail, it's not nearly as important as the KDC, but
it is important
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:04:08PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
The LDAP server is nowhere NEAR as important. If they crack that,
all they'll get is ... what, nothing basically?
Depends on who's relying on the LDAP server and for what.
If important systems are using LDAP for user
Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday, January 06, 2006 12:37:51 PM +0100 Turbo Fredriksson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:03:44 AM +0200 Amir Saad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP
services and i think this reduces the hacking chances.
please tell me if this is not true..
thanks
Amir Saad
Software Engineer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Turbo Fredriksson
Sent: Sat 1/7/2006 12:38 PM
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: Re: KDC Hardware
Quoting
Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:03:44 AM +0200 Amir Saad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the suitable hardware configuration for the KDC to support a
network with 200 machines? thanks
On Friday, January 06, 2006 12:37:51 PM +0100 Turbo Fredriksson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:03:44 AM +0200 Amir Saad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the suitable hardware configuration for the KDC to support a network
with 200 machines?
thanks
Amir Saad
Software Engineer
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the suitable hardware configuration for the KDC to support a
network with 200 machines?
You can't buy a server that small any more.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman
Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the suitable hardware configuration for the KDC to support a
network with 200 machines?
You can't buy a server that small any more.
On Thursday, January 05, 2006 06:53:27 PM + Garrett Wollman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Amir Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use Fedora 4, OpenLDAP and Kerberos instead of NIS
what is the suitable hardware configuration for the KDC to support a
network with
15 matches
Mail list logo
