Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-22 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Ah, OK I understand Merci LD Le Lundi 21 Mars 2005 10:05, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-21 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: Yest, but you need 2 realms You mean two principals? host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for the server and ssh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for service , I ask you if it is ssh or sshd or what No, SSH uses host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] the host principal represents the services which allow a

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Yest, but you need 2 realms host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for the server and ssh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for service , I ask you if it is ssh or sshd or what LD Le Vendredi 18 Mars 2005 17:02, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : > Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > > btw, aht realm does openssh looksfor > > > > s

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: btw, aht realm does openssh looksfor ssh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] No host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? Le Vendredi 18 Mars 2005 14:25, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : Ethan Bearman wrote: You're right - it was right on the cutover - if I add enough groups to the account, I cannot lo

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
btw, aht realm does openssh looksfor ssh/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? Le Vendredi 18 Mars 2005 14:25, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : > Ethan Bearman wrote: > > You're right - it was right on the cutover - if I add enough groups to > > the account, I cannot login via ssh with it, nor can I use kinit. > > > >

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Ethan Bearman wrote: You're right - it was right on the cutover - if I add enough groups to the account, I cannot login via ssh with it, nor can I use kinit. I have had success - finally - getting krb5-1.4 to compile. But does it run? Can you use the 1.4.0 kinit? I had some problems with this

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Ethan Bearman
You're right - it was right on the cutover - if I add enough groups to the account, I cannot login via ssh with it, nor can I use kinit. I have had success - finally - getting krb5-1.4 to compile. How do I get source code to compile a pam kerberos library based on kerberos 1.3.5 or later? Than

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: The problem I see on uskng pam krb is that ticket is on server not on workstation. Maybe you could use flag addressless to fix this issue. but I am not sure. No. The problem as I understand it, is that on the same machine doing a kinit vs using the pam_krb5 giv

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
The problem I see on uskng pam krb is that ticket is on server not on workstation. Maybe you could use flag addressless to fix this issue. but I am not sure. LD Le Vendredi 18 Mars 2005 07:10, Wyllys Ingersoll a écrit : > Douglas E. Engert wrote: > > > I've just run another test and discovere

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-18 Thread Wyllys Ingersoll
Douglas E. Engert wrote: > > I've just run another test and discovered that I can successfully > log into the host initially (via PAM kerberos library and SSH), and > I don't get error 52. I've got a ticket in my cache and > everything. Kerb error 52 only occurs if I'm using kinit from the > shell.

Re: Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-17 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Ethan Bearman wrote: At 07:14 AM 3/17/2005, you wrote: Ethan Bearman wrote: I'm getting kerberos error 52 when I try to kinit from hp-ux (11.0 running on 9000 series system) to our Windows 2003 AD domain. It works for certain admin accounts that have few group memberships, but not for regular

Pam kerberos vs. Kinit

2005-03-17 Thread Ethan Bearman
At 07:14 AM 3/17/2005, you wrote: Ethan Bearman wrote: I'm getting kerberos error 52 when I try to kinit from hp-ux (11.0 running on 9000 series system) to our Windows 2003 AD domain. It works for certain admin accounts that have few group memberships, but not for regular users. I understand t