ll
Cc: Actually davidchr; Tony Hoyle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: microsoft xp gssapi client talking to solaris8 gssapi
server
>>>>> "Wyllys" == Wyllys Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wyllys> The problems with the newer MIT GSS samples and the MS
Wyl
> "Wyllys" == Wyllys Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wyllys> The problems with the newer MIT GSS samples and the MS
Wyllys> samples are not due to GSSAPI/SSPI incompatibilities, but
Wyllys> because MIT added some new "tokens" and flags that the
Wyllys> client and servers
Actually davidchr wrote:
> Our gssapi samples do not speak the same wireprotocol as the
> corresponding gssclient/gssserver in the MIT distribution because ours
> are based on an earlier implementation. See Paul's email on this
> (attached).
>
> If you need the samples to test interop between th
--- R Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: R Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: microsoft xp gssapi client talking to
> solaris8 gssapi server
> To: "Paul B. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EM
>I assumed it was a given in this case that the original export was done
>legally. True, the UK Debian mirror is no different from a US mirror in
>this regard, but I took your message as suggesting there was a known
>export violation here.
My apologies if I implied Debian was doing the wrong th
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:42PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
> >> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
> >> >laws by downloading it.
> >> If you believe THAT, then I've got a c
>> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
>> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
>> >laws by downloading it.
>
>> If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen bridges I'd like to
>> sell you.
>
>Er, which law are you
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK
Tony> debian mirror as a .deb and extract it. The export was not
Tony> done by me & I haven't broken any laws by downloading it.
Tony> However KFW is only available
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 07:23:38AM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
> >laws by downloading it.
> If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen
>Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
>.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
>laws by downloading it.
If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen bridges I'd like to
sell you.
--Ken
__
On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 18:26:08 +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I am fairly sure you're misusing the term active directory here. It's
> certainly true that you're using an extra DLL or two, and you need to
> have a krb5.ini, but you can use your Windows credentials and Windows KDCs.
I've had an implem
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> In the first case you're not using Active Directory, which
Tony> kind of defeats the point.
I am fairly sure you're misusing the term active directory here. It's
certainly true that you're using an extra DLL or two, and you n
On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:51:55 +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> This is of course false. There are two ways you can port Unix GSSAPI
> to Windows. The first is to use MIT's Kerberos for Windows which
> includes a native GSSAPI implementation. The other is to use Martin
> Rex's dll for converting GSS
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:50 + (UTC),
Tony> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R
Tony> Howard) wrote:
>> The code I am compiling on XP is from the MS platform SDK
>> (2/2002). The server on the solaris box is from the krb5-1.2.
k email (spam and UCE) is
expressly prohibited unless by my explicit prior request. I retaliate
viciously against spammers and spam sites.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:50 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R
Howard) wrote:
>The code I am compiling on XP is from the MS platform
>SDK (2/2002). The server on the solaris box is from
>the krb5-1.2.6 distribution.
>
>I am now trying to port the same gss-client from the
>MIT distribution to the
The code I am compiling on XP is from the MS platform
SDK (2/2002). The server on the solaris box is from
the krb5-1.2.6 distribution.
I am now trying to port the same gss-client from the
MIT distribution to the XP box. The Microsoft
compiler does not recognize the gss_nt_service_name
function
Hi,
It sounds like version skew.
On XP are you compiling the sample code that came from the same MIT
disitribution that you are compiling on the Solaris box?
AT one time Microsoft was distributing the GSS sample code from an MIT
snapshot. MIT didn't know it at the time and made some incompatibl
18 matches
Mail list logo