Hey folks, hope someone can help me with this. I have
compiled the sample gssapi client on a microsoft xp
box. It compiled fine. I have the MIT gssapi sample
server compiled on a solaris box. The gssapi server
on the solaris box seems to be working fine. I can
connect to it just fine using th
osoft xp gssapi client talking to solaris8 gssapi server
Hey folks, hope someone can help me with this. I have
compiled the sample gssapi client on a microsoft xp
box. It compiled fine. I have the MIT gssapi sample
server compiled on a solaris box. The gssapi server
on the solaris box seems to
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> R Howard
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: microsoft xp gssapi client talking to
> solaris8 gssapi server
>
>
> Hey folks, hope some
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:50 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R
Howard) wrote:
>The code I am compiling on XP is from the MS platform
>SDK (2/2002). The server on the solaris box is from
>the krb5-1.2.6 distribution.
>
>I am now trying to port the same gss-client from the
>MIT distribution to the
ne time Microsoft was distributing the GSS sample code from an MIT
snapshot. MIT didn't know it at the time and made some incompatible changes
to our sample code. If you mixed the code it didn't work.
Yes, we're sorry about this.
Paul
-----Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:40:50 + (UTC),
Tony> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R
Tony> Howard) wrote:
>> The code I am compiling on XP is from the MS platform SDK
>> (2/2002). The server on the solaris box is from the krb5-1.2.
On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:51:55 +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> This is of course false. There are two ways you can port Unix GSSAPI
> to Windows. The first is to use MIT's Kerberos for Windows which
> includes a native GSSAPI implementation. The other is to use Martin
> Rex's dll for converting GSS
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> In the first case you're not using Active Directory, which
Tony> kind of defeats the point.
I am fairly sure you're misusing the term active directory here. It's
certainly true that you're using an extra DLL or two, and you n
On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 18:26:08 +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I am fairly sure you're misusing the term active directory here. It's
> certainly true that you're using an extra DLL or two, and you need to
> have a krb5.ini, but you can use your Windows credentials and Windows KDCs.
I've had an implem
>Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
>.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
>laws by downloading it.
If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen bridges I'd like to
sell you.
--Ken
__
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 07:23:38AM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
> >laws by downloading it.
> If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen
> "Tony" == Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK
Tony> debian mirror as a .deb and extract it. The export was not
Tony> done by me & I haven't broken any laws by downloading it.
Tony> However KFW is only available
>> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
>> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
>> >laws by downloading it.
>
>> If you believe THAT, then I've got a couple dozen bridges I'd like to
>> sell you.
>
>Er, which law are you
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:53:42PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >> >Similarly, with the MIT tarball, I grab it from the UK debian mirror as a
> >> >.deb and extract it. The export was not done by me & I haven't broken any
> >> >laws by downloading it.
> >> If you believe THAT, then I've got a c
>I assumed it was a given in this case that the original export was done
>legally. True, the UK Debian mirror is no different from a US mirror in
>this regard, but I took your message as suggesting there was a known
>export violation here.
My apologies if I implied Debian was doing the wrong th
--- R Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: R Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: microsoft xp gssapi client talking to
> solaris8 gssapi server
> To: "Paul B. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EM
Actually davidchr wrote:
> Our gssapi samples do not speak the same wireprotocol as the
> corresponding gssclient/gssserver in the MIT distribution because ours
> are based on an earlier implementation. See Paul's email on this
> (attached).
>
> If you need the samples to test interop between th
> "Wyllys" == Wyllys Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wyllys> The problems with the newer MIT GSS samples and the MS
Wyllys> samples are not due to GSSAPI/SSPI incompatibilities, but
Wyllys> because MIT added some new "tokens" and flags that the
Wyllys> client and servers
ll
Cc: Actually davidchr; Tony Hoyle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: microsoft xp gssapi client talking to solaris8 gssapi
server
>>>>> "Wyllys" == Wyllys Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wyllys> The problems with the newer MIT GSS samples and the MS
Wyl
19 matches
Mail list logo
