Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-11 Thread Kevin Coffman
I'll assume we are dealing with a Linux NFS client here. The problem is that the Linux kernel code currently (still) only supports des-cbc-crc. However, if the nfs service principal is set up correctly (with only a des key), there should be no need to restrict the enctypes in krb5.conf. Prob

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-09 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Mark Dieterich wrote: > Ahh... So maybe this is my problem. Should I be limiting the > encryption type on my client side? I'm positive that we have limited > the nfs/host service principles to des-cbc-crc, but our client configs > allow stronger encryption types. The clients seem to be getting

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-08 Thread Mark Dieterich
Ahh... So maybe this is my problem. Should I be limiting the encryption type on my client side? I'm positive that we have limited the nfs/host service principles to des-cbc-crc, but our client configs allow stronger encryption types. The clients seem to be getting 3DES keys. It's actually

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-08 Thread user
Thank you, Jeffrey, for pointing it out. Sorry, I didn't make it clear. It's on the client side, by restricting the requested enctypes in the krb5.conf. In our case, the clients don't support 3DES encryption. default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
user wrote: > I found out when the keytabs were created DES only > for the services. Also in the krb5.conf, we have > > [libdefaults] > ticket_lifetime = 600 > default_realm = EXAMPLE.COM > default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-crc > default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc >

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-07 Thread user
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:36:34 -0400 From: Mark Dieterich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: kerberos@mit.edu Subject: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list Messa

Re: netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-06 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Mark" == Mark Dieterich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> encryption. I'm clearly missing something here. I thought Mark> that kerberos would provide the least common denominator for Mark> encryption type, i.e. we could have our database be Mark> encrypted with des3-hmac-s

netapp, nfs, kerberos, and ldap

2005-04-06 Thread Mark Dieterich
Hi all, I'm fairly new to the list and pretty much a newbie to kerberos and ldap, so please be gentle with me ;) First a little background. We are starting a project to transition from NIS to to kerberos and ldap. One of the eventual goals is to offer secure NFS for our linux/solaris clients