On 2006-01-11, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> cache_lock would create the namecache record in the lower layer
>> (recursively), and then operate in the same manner as if it exited in
>> the first place.
>
> The problem in this case is tha
On 2006-01-11, Simon 'corecode' Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Csaba Henk wrote:
>>>I don't promise anything but try to stay tuned :)
>> Okay it seems Simon means getting this right so no need for me to play
>> the clever boy now.
>
> I don't want to take away your toy :)
That's kind of you
These are all great ideas flying about. Namecache coherency in the
sense of the cluster work is not going to happen for a long time, I'm
just trying to cut down the work that will be involved to make it work
with nullfs later on down the road.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:23:45PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> ALTQ is also not available as integrated with PF.
This is wrong, ALTQ works perfectly fine with PF, actually -- it is the
only way to directly use ALTQ at the moment.
> Do the "user" and "group" keywords work?
It should work, but
Csaba Henk wrote:
I don't promise anything but try to stay tuned :)
Okay it seems Simon means getting this right so no need for me to play
the clever boy now.
I don't want to take away your toy :)
Would you mind explaining what you have in mind?
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT t
Thomas E. Zander wrote:
>
> On the other hand, the new GEOM modules like GDBE and GELI are indeed
> very much appreciated and they work pretty well, so for my personal
> daily usage, GEOM is a clear win.
For me GEOM, and devfs are not clear but huge wins of FreeBSD-(5,6)
over FreeBSD-4. I could
On 2006-01-10, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (2) Do not have a shadow callback. Instead have null_nresolve()
> call a new function, cache_shadow(), which creates the relationship
> between the upper and lower layer namecache records. Only
> null_nresolve() woul
On 2006-01-10, Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't promise anything but try to stay tuned :)
Okay it seems Simon means getting this right so no need for me to play
the clever boy now.
Csaba
Thomas E. Zander wrote:
Well, it blocks raw device write if the reference count of this device
is not zero, i.e. you can't change the partition table of a disk in
multi-user mode if you have mounted filesystems on that disk.
It's a bit uncomfortable sometimes but I wouldn't go as far as to speak
Am Tue, dem 10. Jan 2006, um 22:48 +0100 Uhr schrubte Peter Schuller
zum Thema [Re: cowloop technology]:
> I have seen semi-negative references to GEOM before, but I have been
> unable to find what exactly it is people have a problem with. Out of
> curiousity, is there anything in particular that
10 matches
Mail list logo
