Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread hui
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 01:17:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Antonio Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Linux-only doesn't exist per-se, since linux is GPL and any GPL code > > can be remixed without problems. So, the question would be if it's ok > > to remix GPL with DFBSD license (whic

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread hui
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 10:05:36AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps clever people can design a RCU-like system which doesn't fall under > the RCU patent, who knows? Indeed this per CPU replication of kernel data True, but folks seem to be using

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread hui
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 01:04:50PM +0100, Erik Wikstr?m wrote: > On 2006-11-18 12:02, Antonio Vargas wrote: > Well, there is a difference between copyright-law and patent-law. The > code is protected by GPL (which is not compatible with BSD-licenses, and > I doubt that we'll ever see any GPL in t

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread talon
Erik Wikström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I doubt that we'll ever see any GPL in the kernel). The algorithm (or > technique or whatever) is protected by a patent and you need a special > license to use it, which, as far as I know, IBM have not given to anyone > but Linux. By the way, on the fo

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread talon
Antonio Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > There are patent issues and the GPL license, but this is just too powerful >> > an >> > algorithm to ignore. In many way, this brings out th

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2006-11-18 12:02, Antonio Vargas wrote: On 11/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are patent issues and the GPL license, but this is just too powerful an > algorithm to ignore. In many way, this brings out the ultimate in wh

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread Antonio Vargas
On 11/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are patent issues and the GPL license, but this is just too powerful an > algorithm to ignore. In many way, this brings out the ultimate in what shared > memory system can do. Without

Re: Lockless algorithms [was Re: splxxx replacements?]

2006-11-18 Thread talon
Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are patent issues and the GPL license, but this is just too powerful an > algorithm to ignore. In many way, this brings out the ultimate in what shared > memory system can do. Without entering such troll subjects, the patent issue completely k