Emiel Kollof wrote:
> Op dinsdag 20 maart 2007 22:43, schreef Simon 'corecode' Schubert:
>
>> How it works:
[...]
> If I somehow lag behind with this ...
I'm lagging behind both of you by decades :o) but I do have a
question, based on years of reading bikeshed debates over what
email solution is
Matthew Dillon wrote:
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks Matt,
Would be nice to know how can I swith to using libthread_xu from libc_r
to test this beast. Would be nice if there was some easy way to switch
in b
Op dinsdag 20 maart 2007 22:43, schreef Simon 'corecode' Schubert:
> How it works:
> - binary will be setgid mail or such.
> - mail gets accepted from stdin
> - mail gets written to spool dir
> - per recipient one child is being forked
> - childs try delivering
> - on timeout a bounce is created
>
Op woensdag 21 maart 2007 02:48, schreef Simon 'corecode' Schubert:
> [you're mailing from the future?]
>
> Emiel Kollof wrote:
> >> What is still missing:
> >> - SMTP delivery
> >> - alias expansion
> >> - proper sysexit codes
> >
> > Show us the code. I want to help. These things are where I shin
[you're mailing from the future?]
Emiel Kollof wrote:
What is still missing:
- SMTP delivery
- alias expansion
- proper sysexit codes
Show us the code. I want to help. These things are where I shine :)
heh, the code was attached :)
What I am not sure about:
- should the mailer block until
Op dinsdag 20 maart 2007 22:43, schreef Simon 'corecode' Schubert:
[local only smptd snip]
> What is still missing:
> - SMTP delivery
> - alias expansion
> - proper sysexit codes
Show us the code. I want to help. These things are where I shine :)
> What I am not sure about:
> - should the maile
Hey,
again and again people are complaining about why sendmail is in base and why
not postfix, etc. We keep saying that we do need a mail delivery/transport
agent, for stuff such as periodic, cron, etc.
But that doesn't mean that we need sendmail. Actually a much simpler mailer
would do: o
