Re: devfs: panic on vrele() in nresolve / status of devfs

2009-05-31 Thread Alex Hornung
Oh dear, please disregard my question. I missed that vp->v_ops is a struct vop_ops ** and not struct vop_ops *. On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 13:04 +0100, Alex Hornung wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running again into problems related to referencing and locking of > vnodes. > This time it's in nresolve on vr

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Dmitry Komissaroff wrote: Simon 'corecode' Schubert пишет: Dmitry Komissaroff wrote: I think anyone agree with benefits of devfs. Limited number of dev files really existed hardware in /dev is one of them. And then question: is someone plan to port devfs? No, nobody does. Also, it is not cl

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Dmitry Komissaroff
Simon 'corecode' Schubert пишет: Dmitry Komissaroff wrote: I think anyone agree with benefits of devfs. Limited number of dev files really existed hardware in /dev is one of them. And then question: is someone plan to port devfs? No, nobody does. Also, it is not clear whether a port would be

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Oliver Fromme
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > What I'd like to see is a twofold scheme: A virtual devfs, plus > udev-alike functionality: > > - The devfs will show all existing devices with their standard names, and > only those. > - have userland set permissions and create aliases (links?) That re

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Eric Masson wrote: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello, No, nobody does. Also, it is not clear whether a port would be good or whether rewriting it from scratch would be better. Iirc, Matt eplained a long time ago that he would prefer a Linux udev like scheme (Even

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Eric Masson
"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello, > No, nobody does. Also, it is not clear whether a port would be good or > whether rewriting it from scratch would be better. Iirc, Matt eplained a long time ago that he would prefer a Linux udev like scheme (Events generated by ker

Re: devfs

2008-11-26 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Dmitry Komissaroff wrote: I think anyone agree with benefits of devfs. Limited number of dev files really existed hardware in /dev is one of them. And then question: is someone plan to port devfs? No, nobody does. Also, it is not clear whether a port would be good or whether rewriting it fro