On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:14:54PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> That brings up a question though, how often would cloud expect to do a
>>> yum update of individual packages as opposed t
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> > If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to reall
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each in
On 11.01.2014 09:34, poma wrote:
> On 10.01.2014 08:57, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 04:45 +0100, poma wrote:
>>> 3.13.0-0.rc7.git2.2.fc21.x86_64:
>>> depmod: ERROR: Module 'hci_vhci' has devname (vhci) but lacks major and
>>> minor information. Ignoring.
>>
>> Also reported a week ag
...
After a few dozen tests with the vanilla commits, and with the same
amount of rawhide kernels ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=871694
Dan, Francois you are both welcome with comments!
Thanks.
poma
___
kernel mailing list
kernel@lis
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:14:54PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> That brings up a question though, how often would cloud expect to do a
>> yum update of individual packages as opposed to just updating the
>> entire image? If we expect the 3 ke
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:14:54PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> That brings up a question though, how often would cloud expect to do a
> yum update of individual packages as opposed to just updating the
> entire image? If we expect the 3 kernel magic to work there, then
Unless we jump into Colin's
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:10:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz +
>> > firmwre.
>> Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't
>> include it in my kernel num
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:10:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz +
> > firmwre.
> Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't
> include it in my kernel numbers for that reason.
Currently, this is required by the ker
Am 06.03.2014 19:14, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> That brings up a question though, how often would cloud expect to do a
> yum update of individual packages as opposed to just updating the
> entire image?
in the best case you do the same as i do on our "private cloud"
install once and then upgrade for
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Right. When I said I had kernel-core and kernel-drivers, I wasn't
>> being theoretical. I already did the work in the spec file to split
>> it into kernel-core and kernel-drive
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data
>> > backing up necessity on any of this
Am 06.03.2014 18:04, schrieb Don Zickus:
> Maybe impose only xfs as the fs of choice or some other restrictions and
> chop it further, but then we lose flexibility
hopefully a joke :-)
* i use a ton of virtual Fedora instances
* any of them is using ext4
* some may benefit from XFS but not that
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data
> > backing up necessity on any of this at all though. Right now it seems
> > to be sitting in t
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data
> backing up necessity on any of this at all though. Right now it seems
> to be sitting in the "nice to have" category.
For the record, it is _literally_ sitting i
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Right. When I said I had kernel-core and kernel-drivers, I wasn't
> being theoretical. I already did the work in the spec file to split
> it into kernel-core and kernel-drivers. The kernel package becomes a
> metapackage that requires
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:16:00AM +0900, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> >> That's the point, we want a reasonably small package while still
> >> providing the required functionality.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:38:44AM +0900, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
> > > Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >> in general you need to multiply the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:16:00AM +0900, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
>> That's the point, we want a reasonably small package while still
>> providing the required functionality. Not sure how providing a fixed
>> size number is helping in this. Bu
Am 06.03.2014 16:00, schrieb drago01:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
>>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:38:44AM +0900, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
>
> Exactly, you usually have hundreds
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance
>
> Exactly, you usually have hundreds or even tho
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:16:00AM +0900, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro
23 matches
Mail list logo
