Re: [PATCH] Remove all references to unknown Kconfig symbols

2016-04-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Reported-by: Paul Bolle > --- > 0) This is a rerun of https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ > kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LC2TIYKPWNJNE2L34C26HAUMOUK4BBPK/ > on current master. > > 1)

Re: nf_ct_ftp: dropping packet: partial matching of `227 '

2016-04-14 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Em 14-04-2016 15:14, Reindl Harald escreveu: Am 14.04.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: Em 14-04-2016 08:27, Reindl Harald escreveu: why are that packages dropped in context of nf_nat_ftp? that are the part of FTP connections and that IP exists, has a valid PTR and is a known

[PATCH] Remove all references to unknown Kconfig symbols

2016-04-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Reported-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) This is a rerun of https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LC2TIYKPWNJNE2L34C26HAUMOUK4BBPK/ on current master. 1) Like the previous run this is hardly tested. As a consequence this is not

Re: nf_ct_ftp: dropping packet: partial matching of `227 '

2016-04-14 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Em 14-04-2016 08:27, Reindl Harald escreveu: why are that packages dropped in context of nf_nat_ftp? that are the part of FTP connections and that IP exists, has a valid PTR and is a known client and so what is wrong with cotaining "227"? [845643.840984] nf_ct_ftp: dropping packet: partial

Re: [PATCH] config: x86: stop pretending to be an Lguest guest

2016-04-14 Thread Amit Shah
On (Thu) 14 Apr 2016 [12:48:59], Paul Bolle wrote: > Ever since v2.6.36 there's a conflict between OLPC support and Lguest > guest support: a kernel image can't both support booting OLPC x86 > hardware and booting as an Lguest guest. Booting a kernel image that > tries to do both as an Lguest

Re: [PATCH] config: x86: stop pretending to be an Lguest guest

2016-04-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Hi Josh, On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seems. > Probably OK to disable it for now in any case. Let me think it over. What I wasn't sure about is whether we should bother setting CONFIG_LGUEST (ie, the host side

[PATCH] config: x86: stop pretending to be an Lguest guest

2016-04-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Ever since v2.6.36 there's a conflict between OLPC support and Lguest guest support: a kernel image can't both support booting OLPC x86 hardware and booting as an Lguest guest. Booting a kernel image that tries to do both as an Lguest guest will fail with lguest: Reinjecting trap 13 for fault