On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Well, I don't mind a few more mails, I already get a lot and they make
> > not much of a difference, *if* they are useful somehow. But to be useful
> > they are currently to hard to parse/understand: you have to scroll down
> >
How did the email bridge link the comment on an issue to an older MR?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM GitLab Bridge on behalf of Justin Forbes <
jcl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/29#note_356344429
>
> As I mentioned
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/29#note_356344429
As I mentioned in the thread, what Fedora is set at is not relevant
here, these are new options, and when the MR is created, Fedora is
always set to the same value in pending-fedora. We don't h
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:13 AM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Hi Don!
>
> Am 05.06.20 um 17:01 schrieb Don Zickus:
> > Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Thx for saying that, I already feared I sooner or later might come
> across as the crazy guy that complains about everything and therefor not
> really
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 01:14:33PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:20:24PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> jmflinuxtx wrote:
> > From: "Justin M. Forbes"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> > options need
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:13 PM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Hi Don!
>
> Am 05.06.20 um 17:01 schrieb Don Zickus:
> > Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Thx for saying that, I already feared I sooner or later might come
> across as the crazy guy that complains about everything and therefor not
> really t
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:20:24PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx
wrote:
> From: "Justin M. Forbes"
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewe
Hi Don!
Am 05.06.20 um 17:01 schrieb Don Zickus:
> Thanks for the feedback!
Thx for saying that, I already feared I sooner or later might come
across as the crazy guy that complains about everything and therefor not
really taken seriously… ;-)
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:24:13PM +0200, Thorsten
From: Nicolas Chauvet
As reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/206217 , raw_violation_fixup
is causing more harm than good in some common use-cases.
This patch as RFC is a partial revert of the 191cd6fb5 commit:
"PCI: tegra: Add SW fixup for RAW violations"
that was first introduced in 5.3 ke
Hi Knurd,
Thanks for the feedback!
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:24:13PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo! I'm slightly puzzled. These messages are now sent to
> fedora-kernel-list, which kinda sounds like input from the fedora
> community is wanted. But all this discussions look RHEL-specific t
From: jmflinuxtx on gitlab.com
As reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/206217 , raw_violation_fixup
is causing more harm than good in some common use-cases.
This patch as RFC is a partial revert of the 191cd6fb5 commit:
"PCI: tegra: Add SW fixup for RAW violations"
that was first introduced i
Lo! I'm slightly puzzled. These messages are now sent to
fedora-kernel-list, which kinda sounds like input from the fedora
community is wanted. But all this discussions look RHEL-specific to me.
Or am I missing something? Fedora at least seems to enable
CONFIG_SENSORS_AMD_ENERGY if I read
https://g
Le lun. 18 mai 2020 à 18:03, Peter Robinson a écrit :
>
> > > > FYI, I've experienced a stability issue with the jetson-tk1 NIC since
> > > > kernel 5.3 and later.
> > > > This is reported upstream at
> > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206217
> > > > To sum-up: under some "MMC an
Ivan, Marcelo, could you please review this?
Jiri
On Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:20:24 -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx wrote:
> From: "Justin M. Forbes"
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the AR
14 matches
Mail list logo
