Hi folks.
Why successfully builded kernel by koji (here is build log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/kernel/5.10.0/0.rc0.20201021git071a0578b0ce.49.fc34/data/logs/x86_64/build.log)
but failed to build kernel with same spec locally in mock (here is build log:
https://pastebin.com/ZL
On 21 Oct 2020 17:40, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration op
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 12:55 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > create mode 100644 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_I2C_MLXBF
In any case this should be under .../generic/arm/aarch64/
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 02:37 -0400, Gopal Tiwari wrote:
> CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_TESTUNIT : This looks promising to me. I think enabling this
> is no harm. But leaving it for now.
>
> CONFIG_I2C_MLXBF : let's wait till we receive any request from partner or
> customer.
You mean like:
https://bugzil
On 06/07/2020 11:37 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> jeremycline wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
>
>
On 08/12/2020 07:57 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
2020-10-19, 19:16:40 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:59PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > 2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > > jeremycline wrote:
> > > > -
On 10/21/20 1:27 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
From: Fedora Kernel Team
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
configuration options from the pe
CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_TESTUNIT : This looks promising to me. I think enabling this
is no harm. But leaving it for now.
CONFIG_I2C_MLXBF : let's wait till we receive any request from partner or
customer.
Would think to enable CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_TESTUNIT in future. I am fine with the
configuration for
On 10/21/20 1:03 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline @ 2020-10-16 08:29 MST:
From: Fedora Kernel Team
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving u
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:47:50 -
GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> c
On 10/16/2020 10:29 AM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
On 10/21/2020 12:46 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:48:14PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
> From: Jeremy Cline
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> c
On 10/16/2020 10:29 AM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
On 10/22/20 8:21 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 10/21/20 1:27 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
From: Fedora Kernel Team
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves movin
On 10/21/2020 12:47 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: "CKI@GitLab"
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration options f
On 10/21/2020 12:48 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration opt
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/492#note_434616703
Closing this as the workflow change is live and this patch is no longer
relevant there.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/491#note_434616506
Closing this as the workflow change is live and this patch is no longer
relevant there.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 06:25 +, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> con
Don Dutile @ 2020-10-21 20:53 MST:
> On 10/21/20 1:03 PM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline @ 2020-10-16 08:29 MST:
>>
>>> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
>>> options need to be reviewe
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:01 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:36:01AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:39 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrot
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:36:01AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:39 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to build test kernels on
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:39 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build test kernels on my Fedora 33 machine
> > > and ran into:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:59 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> A couple of months ago I filed bugs about the kernel-cki build
> process and some problems I encountered:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues
>
> Today, I wanted to build a test kernel for a Fedora user with an
> a
Hey,
A couple of months ago I filed bugs about the kernel-cki build
process and some problems I encountered:
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues
Today, I wanted to build a test kernel for a Fedora user with an
additional custom patch, and couldn't find much interesting or up-to-dat
On 10/21/20 1:27 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuration o
On 10/21/20 1:48 PM, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
> From: jeremycline on gitlab.com
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed
> configuratio
On 10/22/20 2:37 AM, Gopal Tiwari wrote:
> CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_TESTUNIT : This looks promising to me. I think enabling this
> is no harm. But leaving it for now.
>
> CONFIG_I2C_MLXBF : let's wait till we receive any request from partner or
> customer.
>
> Would think to enable CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_TE
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm trying to build test kernels on my Fedora 33 machine
> > and ran into:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890107
> >
> > Does anyone know a work-around for this? I t
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:27 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm trying to build test kernels on my Fedora 33 machine
> > and ran into:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890107
> >
> > Does anyone know a work-around for this? I tried a
33 matches
Mail list logo
