Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] Fix sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl

2021-06-01 Thread Herton R. Krzesinski (via Email Bridge)
From: Herton R. Krzesinski on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1162#note_590486181 Acked-by: Herton R. Krzesinski (via approve button) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] Fix sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl

2021-06-01 Thread Justin Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1162#note_590350124 Added "include in releases" as the kernel will not build without it. I added it to dist-git for rc4 in Fedora, which is building with this patch now successfully. _

[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] Fix sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl

2021-06-01 Thread Jiri Olsa (via Email Bridge)
From: Jiri Olsa on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1162 NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'jo...@kernel.org' does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address 'jo...@redhat.com'. There's recent change [1] tha

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] RHEL: disable io_uring support

2021-06-01 Thread Justin Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1159#note_590315781 Acked-by: Justin Forbes (via approve button) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kerne

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] RHEL: disable io_uring support

2021-06-01 Thread Jeff Moyer (via Email Bridge)
From: Jeff Moyer RHEL: disable io_uring support Bugzilla: 1964537 Upstream Status: RHEL only io_uring is still under very active development. Disable support for now. We will reassess this decision each minor release. Note: this is a temporary patch which can be reverted after RHEL 9 branche

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: Set PVPANIC_MMIO for x86 and PVPANIC_PCI for aarch64

2021-06-01 Thread Eric Auger (via Email Bridge)
From: Eric Auger on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1158#note_590150212 Yes. I meant this would deserve separate enablement and testing at libvirt level AND qemu level. I guess the pvpanic-pci device is not compiled either at qemu level for x86. Anyway I would

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: Set PVPANIC_MMIO for x86 and PVPANIC_PCI for aarch64

2021-06-01 Thread Andrew Jones (via Email Bridge)
From: Andrew Jones on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1158#note_590144424 Since I don't have an ACK button... Acked-by: Andrew Jones ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: Set PVPANIC_MMIO for x86 and PVPANIC_PCI for aarch64

2021-06-01 Thread Andrew Jones (via Email Bridge)
From: Andrew Jones on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1158#note_590142249 A separate BZ for x86 pci pvpanic makes sense, as support for it should be discussed. The libvirt reason shouldn't make a difference though, since libvirt will be gaining support for AAr

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/configs: Set PVPANIC_MMIO for x86 and PVPANIC_PCI for aarch64

2021-06-01 Thread Eric Auger (via Email Bridge)
From: Eric Auger on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1158#note_590105917 At this stage my goal was just to fix the regression on x86 PVPANIC/ISA while adding the functionality on aarch64. If we decide to add PVPANIC-PCI on x86 this may handled through another B