Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv4 0/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL

From: Coiby Xu on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1442#note_721676840 Thanks for the reminding. The change has been rebased. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 1/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL

From: Coiby Xu redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994858 KEXEC_SIG needs to be enabled for aarch64 so the kernel image's signature can be verified when loading a kernel image via kexec with secureboot enabled. Since this

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 2/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_IMAGE_VERIFY_SIG for RHEL

From: Coiby Xu redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_IMAGE_VERIFY_SIG for RHEL CONFIG_KEXEC_IMAGE_VERIFY_SIG is enabled so kernel image signature verification support could be enabled for aarch64. This option has already been enabled for Fedora. Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu diff --git

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 0/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL

From: Coiby Xu on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1442 Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994858 KEXEC_SIG needs to be enabled for aarch64 so the kernel image's signature can be verified when loading a kernel image via

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL

From: Mark Salter on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1442#note_721266539 Acked-by: Mark Salter (via approve button) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/2] redhat/configs: enable KEXEC_SIG for aarch64 RHEL

From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1442#note_721251288 This change needs to be rebased and force pushed. We rebase os-build with every .0 release, and that was done yesterday. ___ kernel

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Enable e1000 in rhel9 as unsupported

From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1382#note_721117226 That is really a RHEL call, it just seemed the natural thing to do given it exists. Either way, it needs to be wrapped, because this driver is just as supported as anything else we

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Enable e1000 in rhel9 as unsupported

From: Ken Cox on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1382#note_721057450 Justin, Regarding mark_driver_unsupported, it looks like it only prints a warning. Don't we need to also set the tainted flag? I was using other unsupported drivers (mptsas) as a reference.