From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342932614
I am ok with the thread being closed.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@li
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342830110
@dzickus? Can this thread be closed?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le.
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342829822
Okay, testing of `kernel-redhat-0.1-42.el9` -> `kernel-redhat-0.1-42.el10` was
successful, and we've answered the issue of upgrading to an older kernel
version. So I think this thre
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
> bump happening to them. Namely,
>
> libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
> libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
>
> IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd dep
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342374369
From Jaroslav Mracek in private email: "Our solver transforms `kernel-
redhat-0.1-42.el9` into name ('kernel-redhat'), epoch (not mentioned but
present in metadata -> `0`), version (
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342289212
@jmflinuxtx please don't feel bad about raising this issue. This is EXACTLY
why we do reviews and it's worth checking in with the rpm and dnf teams. I'm
also going to do the test I
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342277965
I just did a quick test rebuilding the F37 kernel-test against F38 and dnf
will consider it an upgrade. This was originally an issue in Fedora a bit
over 10 years ago, so there has
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2386#note_1342252181
@jstancek, it may be that we do have to add a RHEL_MAJOR value into the new
VR. But based on @knurd42 comment above I'd like to have a definitive
statement about whether or not the
Hi,
I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname
bump happening to them. Namely,
libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2
libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4
IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on
them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts
