From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2873#note_1729234620
@pabeni @jbencrh waiting for your ACKs then (despite the CKI failures here,
per above).
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2873#note_1729192947
@jmflinuxtx anything we can do to unblock this? Even after the rebase, it is
still failing to build due to unrelated stuff: https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-
hat-ci-tools
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2873#note_1729064792
I just rebased it. Previous one was failing to build due to some unrelated
issue: https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci-tools/kernel/cki-internal-
pipelines/cki-trusted
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
net: bump CONFIG_MAX_SKB_FRAGS to 45
As requested via
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-467
With the reasoning from:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220203015140.3022854-10-eric.duma...@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
diff --git a/redhat
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2873#note_1725925757
@jmflinuxtx any ideas on what went horribly wrong here?
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
net: bump CONFIG_MAX_SKB_FRAGS to 45
As requested via
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-467
With the reasoning from:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220203015140.3022854-10-eric.duma...@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
diff --git a/redhat
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Revert "redhat: ark: disable CONFIG_NET_SCH_MULTIQ"
This reverts commit c38d726e757e11176d9c9cdd3b5690dd646fd390.
Turns out, interestingly, DPDK uses it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991624
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1209#note_642474083
I don't see the Approve button, so:
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
fingers crossed ;-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1209#note_642473045
AFAICT this is ready to fly now.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1179#note_604251804
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1181
NOTE: Truncated patchset since committer email 'psut...@redhat.com'
does not match the submitter's GitLab public email address
'mleit...@redhat.com'.
These three
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
redhat/configs: enable CONFIG_NET_ACT_MPLS
It's enabled on RHEL8 and it's going to be needed on RHEL9 as well.
Cc: Guillaume Nault
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_MPLS
b/redhat/configs/common
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1179#note_604122887
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1063#note_584377606
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1063#note_584377432
I have the same problem and approving via revumatic gave me a 403:
gitlab.exceptions.GitlabMRApprovalError: 403: 403 Forbidden
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:02:27PM -, Justin Forbes (via Email
Bridge) wrote:
> From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1117#note_570213935
>
> > Anyway, the commands I used are: time find . -name "Makefile\*" -exec
> grep '.o' {} ; >
p and l2tp mdoules in
> there. Instead all those modules should stay in modules-extra.
>
> Move the offending modules into modules-extra.
>
> Cc: mleit...@redhat.com
> Cc: l...@redhat.com
> Cc: jb...@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus
Good catch.
The email is missing the ---
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/994#note_543351708
Considering this will be visible to the user that tries to load the
module, EPERM can be misleading. It can mean that a SELinux policy is
blocking it (EPERM and EACCES
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_IP_VS_TWOS is not set
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:07:51PM -, Prarit Bhargava (via Email Bridge)
wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>
> RHMAINTAINERS: NETWORKING: Add entry for Balazs Nemeth
>
> Balazs is now part of the networking team.
>
> RH-Acked-by: Balazs Nemeth
> RH-Acked-by:
current changes regarding the following
> configuration option(s):
>
> CONFIG_MLX5_EN_IPSEC
It is also enabled on RHEL8, there are no actual change regarding that
here and I'm not aware of a reason for it to change, so:
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
__
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:59:34AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:39:48 -0300
> Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:35:50PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > redhat-patchlab wrote:
> > ...
> > > --- /dev/nu
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:35:50PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
redhat-patchlab wrote:
...
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_BRIDGE_CFM
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_BRIDGE_CFM is not set
Hi Ivan,
Thoughts on this one? I'm not seeing a direct use case for it.
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 04:25:38PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Paul Bolle wrote:
> >
> > Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-12-2020 om 21:30 [+0100]:
> > > Currently there seem to be over 6000 texlive packages. (Quick and dirty
> > > measurements, sorry.) So splitting the
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:53:04PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:15 PM Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:31:17AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > You should see the hoops people go through to make their controllers work,
> > > either installing
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:07:32PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
...
> redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_QRTR_SMD | 0
> redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_QRTR_TUN | 0
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644
I couldn't find a good part of the cover letter to quote while acking,
to I stripped all out.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:32:18PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:26:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> jmflinuxtx wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:26:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx
wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP is not set
Seems the =y here is not sticking.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:16:46PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:46:41 -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx
> wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +# CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP is not set
>
> We have
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:59PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > jeremycline wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > ++
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 6:29 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:19:39PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:33 PM Marcelo R
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:19:39PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:33 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:56PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > jeremycline wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> >
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
Sabrina, thoughts?
___
kernel
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:56PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_CAN_ISOTP
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_CAN_ISOTP is not set
I'm not aware of any reason for it to be enabled, so
Acked-by: Marcelo Ric
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 16:23 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:16:32 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:46:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:23:00PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:16:32 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:46:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > jmflinuxtx wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > ++
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:46:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx
wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE is not set
Acked-by: Marcelo Ric
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:08:21PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
wrote:
> From: prarit on gitlab.com
>
> General updates bringing RHMAINTAINERS up to date for Sept 10, 2020.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mai
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:44:59PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 9/10/20 1:27 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:08:21PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
> > wrote:
> >> From: prarit on gitlab.com
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 05:08:21PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
wrote:
> From: prarit on gitlab.com
>
> General updates bringing RHMAINTAINERS up to date for Sept 10, 2020.
It claims to be a cumulative change but I'm not seeing this patch from
Jiri:
Subject: [RHDOCS] RHMAINTAINERS:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 01:37:23PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
wrote:
> From: prarit on gitlab.com
>
> The merge request had no description.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedorapr
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:03:27PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 8/24/20 3:21 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:15:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:24:28PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> >
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:15:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:24:28PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> >
> > But yeah, some will complain that now they need to copy a different
> > file to import the .config, but at least they
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:52:19PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:31:53AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > > Right. rh-configs and fedora-configs are nice in that they build ONLY
> > > those
> > > configs.
> > >
> > I don't see a problem with having them broken out for
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 01:37:24PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
wrote:
> From: Prarit Bhargava
>
> The 'dist-configs' is not working properly as it only creates ELN
> configs. The 'rh-configs' and 'fedora-configs' targets are not
> working properly and should be creating ELN and
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 04:39:35AM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
jeremycline wrote:
> From: Fedora Kernel Team
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration
> options need to be reviewed.
>
> As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving
edhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MLX5_IPSEC
> b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MLX5_IPSEC
> new file mode 100644
> index ..d376e7acdc9f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_MLX5_IPSEC
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_MLX5_IPSEC is
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:48 AM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 04:12:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> > jmflinuxtx wrote:
> > > From: Justin Forbes
>
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 04:12:53PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx
wrote:
> From: Justin Forbes
>
> This reverts merge request !537
Why?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:33:30PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of dcaratti
wrote:
> From: dcaratti on gitlab.com
>
> The merge request had no description.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedorapr
Reported-by: mleit...@redhat.com
This fixes it here. Thanks!
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:03:07PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of dcaratti
wrote:
> From: dcaratti on gitlab.com
>
> after a joint review of the configuration for net/sched area, disable
> qdiscs/filters/actions that are not commonly used.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Lei
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:36:11AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 7/30/20 10:19 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:50:54AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >> On 7/29/20 1:29 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
...
> > Oh. That's not what th
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:50:54AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 7/29/20 1:29 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:24:39PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of Justin
> > Forbes wrote:
> > ...
> >>> Also,
> >>> redhat/Ma
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:24:39PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of Justin
Forbes wrote:
...
> > Also,
> > redhat/Makefile:
> > dist-configs: dist-configs-prep
> > @cd $(REDHAT)/configs; VERSION=$(KVERSION)
> ./generate_all_configs.sh rhel 1; \
> >
>
> > ./process_configs.sh
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:03:09PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of dcaratti
> wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_NET_SCH_ATM
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +#
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:03:09PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of dcaratti
wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_NET_SCH_ATM
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +# CONFIG_NET_SCH_ATM is not set
Without this patch:
configs ((7deb2615faaa...))]$ find -name CONFIG_NET_SCH_ATM | xargs
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 01:14:33PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:20:24PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of
> jmflinuxtx wrote:
> > From: "Justin M. Forbes"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of the ongoing rebase e
644 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE
> delete mode 100644 redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE
>
> diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE
> b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_ACT_GATE
> new file mode 100644
> ind
Cc'ing netfilter@ too
Thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CLNQ6O6OGNEJAFFSNV56KU6P2JAPM5YU/
Em 16-04-2016 10:52, Reindl Harald escreveu:
Am 15.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 14.04.2016 um 23:53 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo
Em 14-04-2016 15:14, Reindl Harald escreveu:
Am 14.04.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner:
Em 14-04-2016 08:27, Reindl Harald escreveu:
why are that packages dropped in context of nf_nat_ftp?
that are the part of FTP connections and that IP exists, has a valid PTR
and is a known
Em 14-04-2016 08:27, Reindl Harald escreveu:
why are that packages dropped in context of nf_nat_ftp?
that are the part of FTP connections and that IP exists, has a valid PTR
and is a known client and so what is wrong with cotaining "227"?
[845643.840984] nf_ct_ftp: dropping packet: partial
Em 01-05-2014 10:38, Josh Boyer escreveu:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a discrepancy in the terminology of these two packages:
- kernel-drivers[1]
- kernel-modules-extra
Are these[1] modules passed the driving test?
Should I read the
64 matches
Mail list logo
