Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: support BUILDID again

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3443#note_2161512494 Why not just set LOCVERFILE? Wouldn't that work on that line? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: support BUILDID again

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3443#note_2161217763 I'm not in favor of this change. This means we now have an ABI lockdown in the redhat Makefiles, and that is not good for future changes. The switch from BUILDID to LOCALVE

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Apr 26 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Apr 26 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] arch/x86: Fix XSAVE check for x86_64-v2 check

From: Prarit Bhargava arch/x86: Fix XSAVE check for x86_64-v2 check The flag check should be XSAVE, not OSXSAVE. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Enable CONFIG_AMDTEE for x86

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3049#note_1834736262 NACKED. I don't have an AMD t-shirt and I don't think anyone else should either. (joking of course) approved. --

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/kernel.spec.template: update license

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3040#note_1829167195 I have verified that both BSD-2-Clause and Apache-2.0 are listed in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Mar 18 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Mar 18 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: Where is jforbes (kernel maintainer) for the next 4-8 weeks?

On 3/6/24 15:50, Justin Forbes wrote: Unfortunately I will be out on medical leave for the next 4-8 weeks. Augusto Caringi (acaringi) has been doing a great job with the fedora stable kernel releases recently and will be the point of contact for fedora kernel issues in my absence. Other good po

Re: asking for help on i686 kernel problem v2

On 3/5/24 10:06, Justin Forbes wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:10 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 07:59 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote: On 3/4/24 11:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, We can't build webkitgtk on i686 lately. webkitgtk is in critical path and break rawhide compose

Re: asking for help on i686 kernel problem v2

On 3/4/24 11:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, We can't build webkitgtk on i686 lately. webkitgtk is in critical path and break rawhide composes, if fail to install [1] , so we can't soname bump jpegXL As reported in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11775 seems that downgrade kernel fro

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] spec: suppress "set +x" output

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2971#note_1801481359 You do not want to know how much time I spend trying to make that work. I should have just asked LOL -- ___ kernel mailing list

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro After last week's debugging session I was reminded why I hate debugging the kernel.spec. It's not that it's long, or that the code is difficult to understand -- it's that it can be difficult to map preci

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro After last week's debugging session I was reminded why I hate debugging the kernel.spec. It's not that it's long, or that the code is difficult to understand -- it's that it can be difficult to map preci

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro After last week's debugging session I was reminded why I hate debugging the kernel.spec. It's not that it's long, or that the code is difficult to understand -- it's that it can be difficult to map preci

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Add log_msg macro After last week's debugging session I was reminded why I hate debugging the kernel.spec. It's not that it's long, or that the code is difficult to understand -- it's that it can be difficult to map preci

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 2/2] redhat/self-test: Update CROSS_DISABLED_PACKAGES

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update CROSS_DISABLED_PACKAGES CROSS_DISABLED_PACKAGES was changed in the previous commit and is exposed in the self-test data. Update the CROSS_DISABLED_PACKAGES entries in the self-test data. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 1/2] redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds When executing one of the cross build targets, for example, dist-cross-aarch64-build, the compile fails with cc1: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mbranch-protection=standard' cc1: error: unrecognized co

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2949 JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELMISC-2923 When executing one of the cross build targets, for example, dist-cross-aarch64-build, the compile fails with cc1: error

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds When executing one of the cross build targets, for example, dist-cross-aarch64-build, the compile fails with cc1: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mbranch-protection=standard' cc1: error: unrecognized co

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat: Do not build libperf with cross builds When executing one of the cross build targets, for example, dist-cross-aarch64-build, the compile fails with cc1: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mbranch-protection=standard' cc1: error: unrecognized co

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/4] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic (v2)

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2913#note_1781333867 create-data.sh now calls the setup_source make target, which calls dist-clean- sources. The dist-clean-sources skips the cleanup due to being wrapped with ifndef RHSELFTESTDATA

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 16 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 16 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] arch/x86: mark x86_64-v1 and x86_64-v2 processors as deprecated

From: Prarit Bhargava arch/x86: mark x86_64-v1 and x86_64-v2 processors as deprecated Upstream Status: RHEL only The x86 industry has defined microarchitecture levels x86_64-v1 and x86_64-v2 as defined here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Microarchitecture_levels RHEL9 has a

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 2 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 2 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 2 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Feb 2 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] configs: make CONFIG_EDAC_GHES a module

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2914#note_1752140671 That's what we all say when we break the build :) (joking). -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1740140262 In case it isn't obvious :) well done @omos :) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv8 0/3] redhat/Makefile: fix and clean up some of the logic

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2892#note_1738436678 I approve of the cleanup but I'm not sure I like the idea of moving the KABI tarballs from SOURCES to /redhat. Was there a compelling reason to move

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: Remove HOTPLUG_CPU0 configs

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/configs: Remove HOTPLUG_CPU0 configs linux commit e59e74dc48a3 ("x86/topology: Remove CPU0 hotplug option") removed the code that implements these CONFIGs. These files can be safely removed. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/conf

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Jan 5 2024

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Jan 5 2024 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/self-test: Remove --all from git query

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Remove --all from git query It was reported that executing this test on an older tag failed. This occurs because the git query to find the most recent "[redhat] kernel" commit looks at the entire git history instead of the branch's history

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Dec 8 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Dec 8 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Dec 8 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Dec 8 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] redhat: scripts: An automation script for disabling unused driver for x86

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2832#note_1683927918 So I'll ask again: Why aren't you using the custom-overrides for this functionality, and tracking the contents of that file locally? It seems a better approach would b

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] redhat: scripts: An automation script for disabling unused driver for x86

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2832#note_1682131422 Then, like @jstancek , I don't understand the problem being solved here. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/0] redhat: scripts: An automation script for disabling unused driver for x86

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2832#note_1682032702 Not to pile on but if you want to use the 'standard' config we've laid out and then disable or enable configs, then why aren't you using the custom-overri

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] aarch64: enable uki

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2818#note_1668421817 Approving but I think others should take a look as well. @jstancek @jmflinuxtx @ptalbert? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Nov 27 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Nov 27 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: module signing: Changing to MODULE_SIG_SHA3_512

On 11/9/23 08:13, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:03 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote: On 11/8/23 08:33, Prarit Bhargava wrote: Hey everyone, The current kernel configs generate # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA256 is not set

Re: module signing: Changing to MODULE_SIG_SHA3_512

On 11/8/23 08:33, Prarit Bhargava wrote: Hey everyone, The current kernel configs generate # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA256 is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA384 is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA512=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA3_256 is not set

module signing: Changing to MODULE_SIG_SHA3_512

Hey everyone, The current kernel configs generate # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA256 is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA384 is not set CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA512=y # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA3_256 is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_SHA3_384 is not set #

[OS-BUILD PATCH] kernel/rh_messages.c: Mark functions as possibly unused

From: Prarit Bhargava kernel/rh_messages.c: Mark functions as possibly unused Upstream Status: RHEL Only These functions may or may not be used in different architectures. Mark them all as __maybe_unused. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/kernel/rh_messages.c b/kernel

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Really remove cpupower files

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat: Really remove cpupower files a13e49d0dd0f ("redhat: Remove cpupower files") removed the need for these files but they were left in place. Really remove these dead files. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/scripts/kernel-tools/cpupower

[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: remove update_scripts.sh

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat: remove update_scripts.sh Remove update_scripts.sh and incorporate it as a function in the Makefile. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile +++ b/redhat/Makefile

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760#note_1626463715 With the current version of tar AFAICT, the "J" isn't necessary. Yeah, that surprised me too. ___ kernel mailing

[OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh | 4

[OS-BUILD PATCHv6 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCHv6 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

[OS-BUILD PATCHv6 2/3] redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz Switch the KABI tarballs to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh b/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh index blahblah..blahblah 100755 --- a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh +++ b/redhat/scripts

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 27 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 27 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760#note_1618227797 Thanks. Both fixed. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le

[OS-BUILD PATCHv5 2/3] redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz Switch the KABI tarballs to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh b/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh index blahblah..blahblah 100755 --- a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh +++ b/redhat/scripts

[OS-BUILD PATCHv5 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh | 4

[OS-BUILD PATCHv5 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

[OS-BUILD PATCHv5 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh | 4

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 2/3] redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz Switch the KABI tarballs to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh b/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh index blahblah..blahblah 100755 --- a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh +++ b/redhat/scripts

[OS-BUILD PATCHv4 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh | 4

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 2/3] redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/scripts: Switch KABI tarballs to xz Switch the KABI tarballs to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh b/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh index blahblah..blahblah 100755 --- a/redhat/scripts/rh-dist-git.sh +++ b/redhat/scripts

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760#note_1618114473 Oh, interesting. I've removed this commit and pushed a new version without it. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraprojec

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 2/2] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 1/2] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4

[OS-BUILD PATCH 2/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Remove explicit xz as requirement

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Remove explicit xz as requirement Remove the explicit xz as a requirement. This will be picked up by the %compression variable at the end of the line. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat

[OS-BUILD PATCH 1/3] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/kernel.spec.template: Switch KABI compression to xz Switch KABI compression to xz. There's no reason it has to be bz2. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile

[OS-BUILD PATCH 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for KABI xz change The extension on the KABI files has changed from bz2 to xz. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 index blahblah

[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/3] redhat: Switch KABI file compression to xz

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2760 Switch the KABI compression from bz2 to xz to match other compression targets. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava --- redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 | 4

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023

On 10/17/23 07:01, Prarit Bhargava (via Email Bridge) wrote: From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava Sorry everyone. Screwed up the systemd unit file for this. Closed. P. diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 17 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 16 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] enable CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING for x86_64

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2735#note_1589699422 Could this break crash and other debug utilities? ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 2 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Oct 2 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for cross compile fields

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for cross compile fields Add CROSS_DISABLED_SUBPACKAGES and update .DEFAULT_GOAL, which now points to dist-cross-setup. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 2/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages Add a message for the disabled subpackages. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile.cross b/redhat/Makefile.cross index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile.cross +++ b/redhat

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages The bpftool, perf, and tools subpackages require architecture-specific packages and currently cannot be built with the existing cross compiler packages. Disable them for cross compiler builds. Signed

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Disable subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2723 There are subpackages that won't compile due to architectural differences and cross compiling packaging issues. Disable these packages from cross compiling. This shouldn&#

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 3/3] redhat/self-test: Update data for cross compile fields

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/self-test: Update data for cross compile fields Add CROSS_DISABLED_SUBPACKAGES and update .DEFAULT_GOAL, which now points to dist-cross-setup. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/self-test/data/centos-2585cf9dfaad.el7 b/redhat/self-test/data

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 1/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages The bpftool, perf, and tools subpackages require architecture-specific packages and currently cannot be built with the existing cross compiler packages. Disable them for cross compiler builds. Signed

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 2/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages Add a message for the disabled subpackages. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile.cross b/redhat/Makefile.cross index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile.cross +++ b/redhat

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/3] redhat/Makefile.cross: Disable subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2723 There are subpackages that won't compile due to architectural differences and cross compiling packaging issues. Disable these packages from cross compiling. This shouldn&#

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2720#note_1572901766 Ah thanks :) ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2720#note_1572279089 I've fixed this in the latest push. But the MR still seems to fail but I can't see an actual test failure? @mh21 any ideas? I just see a red x with no actual te

[OS-BUILD PATCH 2/2] redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Add message for disabled subpackages Add a message for the disabled subpackages. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/Makefile.cross b/redhat/Makefile.cross index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/Makefile.cross +++ b/redhat

[OS-BUILD PATCH 1/2] redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava redhat/Makefile.cross: Update cross targets with disabled subpackages The bpftool, perf, and tools subpackages require architecture-specific packages and currently cannot be built with the existing cross compiler packages. Disable them for cross compiler builds. Signed

[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] redhat/Makefile.cross: Disable subpackages

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2723 There are subpackages that won't compile due to architectural differences and cross compiling packaging issues. Disable these packages from cross compiling. This shouldn&#

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Add rpmbuild --without base option

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2719#note_1569939433 I'm with @tales-aparecida on ths, please fixup the commit. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[OS-BUILD PATCHv3] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool The selftests turn bpftool on unconditionally. If a user has specified --without bpftool it means the user really wants to disable bpftool. In this case the selftest should be disabled. Disable selftests and output a message

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2720#note_1569520971 Odd .. this seems to have failed a CI check. Looking into it now. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2720#note_1567874681 I updated the message to be a bit more generic. Instead of referencing 'without bpftool' the rpm log will output 'bpftools disabled ... disabling selftests'

[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool The selftests turn bpftool on unconditionally. If a user has specified --without bpftool it means the user really wants to disable bpftool. In this case the selftest should be disabled. Disable selftests and output a message

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2720#note_1567706714 Yeah, TBH, I was thinking this might be better? ``` # selftests require bpftool to be built %if %{with_bpftool} == 0 %{echo:Disabling selftests build: '--without bpftool'

[OS-BUILD PATCH] kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool

From: Prarit Bhargava kernel.spec.template: Fix --without bpftool The selftests turn bpftool on unconditionally. If a user has specified --without bpftool it means the user really wants to disable bpftool. In this case the selftest should be disabled. Disable selftests and output a message

[OS-BUILD PATCH] RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Sep 15 2023

From: Prarit Bhargava RHMAINTAINERS: Update for Sep 15 2023 Update RHMAINTAINERS to latest. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava diff --git a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS b/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS/RHMAINTAINERS index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/rhdocs/MAINTAINERS

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >