From: Jiri Olsa on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_575715916
ah cool, overlooked that, thanks
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fed
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_575712896
Not sure about a scratch build, but this is merged as of 3 days ago, so
the actual builds of the ELN kernel from the last couple of days are
using it. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
From: Jiri Olsa on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_575286497
@mpetlan is there a scratch build somewhere? I can't see it, thanks
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
From: Michael Petlan on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_572283948
Well, the questions about libbpf are legit, but should be addressed
rather by the BPF people: Jiri Olsa and Yauheni Kaliuta
___
kernel maili
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_571904765
There is now a patch queued for upstream, which fixes the build issue. I
am okay with this going in, if it is merged before that patch lands, I
will do a temp MR to include it in releas
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_570153780
So, it turns out this can be problematic for ARK/Rawhide. I just added
this to the kernel-tools package for rawhide, and the issue is, libbpf-
devel is missing hashmap.h. My ongoing co
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_569176912
Is libbpf a separate package in RHEL? In Fedora it is built as part of
the kernel-tools package, but that package is not ported over to
ELN/RHEL because kernel-tools is built as part of
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/#note_569180382
Nevermind, looks like it is a separate package in Fedora as well with an
epoch set so it overrides the kernel-tools package. Which begs, the
question, why weren't we just told to drop i
From: Michael Petlan
[redhat] perf: enable dynamic linking of libbpf
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1957210
Upstream: RHEL-only
description
===
Enable dynamic linking of perf against libbpf. Also, libbpf-devel
becomes a build-dependency for kernel.src.rpm and libbpf becomes
a run
