Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Revert "redhat: configs: Disable xtables and ipset"

2023-01-27 Thread Phil Sutter (via Email Bridge)
From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2267#note_1255774113 OK, I'll respin adding the relevant modules to mod-extra.list.rhel. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Revert "redhat: configs: Disable xtables and ipset"

2023-01-26 Thread Jonathan Toppins (via Email Bridge)
From: Jonathan Toppins on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2267#note_1254156562 `Maybe moving the modules to kernel-modules-extra could be an option?` Sure, that might work. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fe

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Revert "redhat: configs: Disable xtables and ipset"

2023-01-26 Thread Phil Sutter (via Email Bridge)
From: Phil Sutter on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2267#note_1253667037 @jtoppins_redhat firewalld does support nft backend, it's the default in RHEL9 IIRC. I guess this is mostly about libvirt migration not being complete. Maybe moving the modules to kerne

[OS-BUILD PATCH] Revert "redhat: configs: Disable xtables and ipset"

2023-01-26 Thread Phil Sutter (via Email Bridge)
From: Phil Sutter Revert "redhat: configs: Disable xtables and ipset" This reverts commit ebafea5303ae22b582590917be79c10f073d76fe. It seems kernel-ark config is used for libvirt testing with upstream kernels. Libvirt still requires iptables, though. So revert this for now. Contrary to reverte