Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-10 Thread Al Stone (via Email Bridge)
From: Al Stone on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_526418916 No real concerns. Follow Rule 4096: do what Peter says -- move the lockdown to generic and enable it. ___ kernel mailing list --

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524569661 @ahs3 - can you do a quick sanity check of this conversation and see if you have any concerns? ___ kernel mailing list --

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524400814 @dzickusrh Yes, I suppose a review/insight form the downstream EFI maintainers would be useful here. ___ kernel mailing list --

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524373324 @omos - who else from RHEL should get involved in this review? The EFI lockdown kernel folks? ___ kernel mailing list --

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524364236 Ah, I see... So I should enable CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM=y globally and also add "lockdown" to the CONFIG_LSM list? Or should it stay disabled by default, unless the user

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread pbrobinson (via Email Bridge)
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524345964 So Lockdown LSM is now upstream and it's the vast majority of the implementation of UEFI secure boot. Then Fedora/ARK has a minor patchset on top of that for UEFI secure boot. Downstream

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524338595 I'm not sure if we actually want to have the Lockdown LSM enabled. IIRC, Fedora/RHEL (or just Fedora?) has some downstream patches that implement something similar (I think?)...

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-08 Thread pbrobinson (via Email Bridge)
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922#note_524304568 The BPF LSM patch looks fine, I think the lockdown LSM is incorrect and needs a review/patch too to move it from Fedora -> common/generic and enable it.

[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] Enable BPF LSM on Fedora and ARK

2021-03-03 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Ondrej Mosnáček on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/922 ...and clean up a couple LSM-related configs while there. For more details see the commit messages. ___ kernel mailing list --