From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_535065257
That seems comical
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_535063843
Ugh, sorry, I thought I did, but that was when I accidentally closed it
instead. I failed hard that day.
Acked-by: Justin Forbes
___
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_535061814
@jmflinuxtx - do you want to ACK this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_517406597
The only thing that makes me frown is the with_configcheck=0. However,
the uniqueness of this situation does not have a solution inside the
config generation logic. So I don't seeing be
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_517097782
@dzickusrh Not particularly. The spec was written many years ago, and
updated as needed, but no one has really been motivated towards such a
change before.
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_514643012
@jmflinuxtx - is there a reason why the kernel.spec doesn't use %bcond
more? It appears we use the exploded macro with --with and --without
definitions.
From: Tom Stellard on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/894#note_513497336
I've added a description and a signoff line to the commit message now.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
From: Tom Stellard
[redhat] spec: Add %bcond_with toolchain_clang option
This option can be enabled by passing --with toolchain_clang to rpmbuild
or mock. Enabling this option will cause the kernel to be built with
clang instead of gcc.
Signed-off-by: Tom Stellard
diff
