From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_573638944
We have been building with this for a couple of days now, and I haven't
seen any issues on test systems.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@li
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570170011
From the upstream thread, it seems that building for different targets
can cause problems, for instance, building ppc64 fails, but building
ppc64le on a ppc64 host works. Cross compilin
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570163470
@jmflinuxtx Hmm, ok. cki is still seeing s390x failures too for the
same problem, but meh. CKI also reads FedMessageBus events from Koji.
But if that build is failing then it won't do an
From: Javier Martinez Canillas on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570159244
@dzickusrh yes, it should be safe to merge that for Fedora since as
mentioned in my previous comment the BLS snippets generated on build
time are not used anymore since F33.
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570158863
I added an include in releases to this patch. Note, while the build
fails, it is only aarch64 that is failing. Koji is still producing build
and rpms for all other arch, you just have
From: Justin Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570157165
@dzickusrh Not that I am aware of, the patches I have seen thrown around
upstream are to pahole, not the kernel. This is still being actively
discussed, with the last message in the thr
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_570140864
@martinezjavier How should this work? If we merge @dpward changes
without updating Fedora, things should still work correctly, right?
Currently CKI only tests by building a srpm, which o
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_569297832
(The testing pipeline failure was unrelated to the changes in this merge
request; it succeeded after a rebase.)
___
kernel mailing list -- kerne
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_566372482
@martinezjavier Thanks for the info! I changed this merge request so
that it removes the BLS snippet instead. Does this work?
___
kernel mailing
From: Javier Martinez Canillas on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_561684136
Thanks @dpward for the merge-request. But the BLS snippet shipped by the
kernel package turned out being not flexible enough and since Fedora 33
the BLS are generated by `ker
From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_561660455
@dzickusrh I've added @lszubowi.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lis
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_561616289
@prarit - who are some good kernel/grub developers to review this?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042#note_561398886
Yes I agree with both points, thank you! I updated the commit.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
From: David Ward on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1042
NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing @redhat.com email
address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile.
Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge request
14 matches
Mail list logo