Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891563350 That should do it. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Brian Foster (via Email Bridge)
From: Brian Foster on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891548412 Ok. It seems I'm not able to ack this because of unresolved threads, but I don't see a resolve threads button in my view. Did your previous comment create a thread that you're able to

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891516554 I mean all of the RHELisms are ripped out every time I do a rebased fedora-5.x branch. This ends up being several times a year, and since os-build is rebased, I can't simply keep a

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Brian Foster (via Email Bridge)
From: Brian Foster on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891470421 Can you elaborate? Do you mean that you prefer the ifdef because it makes finding this code easier? Wouldn't we have to scan for callsites anyways given that the empty inlines already

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891415723 I would much rather it not. While things may build and function, it just makes it easier for patches like this to get lost on the Fedora stable rebases, where they are all ripped

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-28 Thread Brian Foster (via Email Bridge)
From: Brian Foster on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_891384587 - [2/2] `4254c840c8f3` ("Add Partner Supported taint flag to kAFS") Thanks for the tweaks. One more nit.. the ifdef in this patch can go away now that patch 1 defines the empty

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-25 Thread Alice Mitchell (via Email Bridge)
From: Alice Mitchell on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603#note_889385733 @Brian Foster thank you for those comments. 1) Looking more closely it does seem you are right and this could benefit from being marked as a per-module taint 2) my mistake, i omitted

[OS-BUILD PATCHv6 0/0] Add Partner Supported taint flag

2022-03-25 Thread Alice Mitchell (via Email Bridge)
From: Alice Mitchell on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1603 NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing public @redhat.com email address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile. Once that is fixed, close and reopen the