On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On do, 2016-04-14 at 13:17 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seems.
>> > Probably OK to disable it for now in any case. Let
Hi Josh,
On do, 2016-04-14 at 13:17 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seems.
> > Probably OK to disable it for now in any case. Let me think it
> > over.
>
> What I wasn't sure about is wheth
On (Thu) 14 Apr 2016 [12:48:59], Paul Bolle wrote:
> Ever since v2.6.36 there's a conflict between OLPC support and Lguest
> guest support: a kernel image can't both support booting OLPC x86
> hardware and booting as an Lguest guest. Booting a kernel image that
> tries to do both as an Lguest guest
Hi Josh,
On do, 2016-04-14 at 07:09 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> lguest is a toy, and one that doesn't work very well it seems.
> Probably OK to disable it for now in any case. Let me think it over.
What I wasn't sure about is whether we should bother setting
CONFIG_LGUEST (ie, the host side suppo
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Ever since v2.6.36 there's a conflict between OLPC support and Lguest
> guest support: a kernel image can't both support booting OLPC x86
> hardware and booting as an Lguest guest. Booting a kernel image that
> tries to do both as an Lguest gues
Ever since v2.6.36 there's a conflict between OLPC support and Lguest
guest support: a kernel image can't both support booting OLPC x86
hardware and booting as an Lguest guest. Booting a kernel image that
tries to do both as an Lguest guest will fail with
lguest: Reinjecting trap 13 for fault a
