On 18 Nov 2020 09:13, Don Zickus wrote:
> +Al, Prarit - FYI
Yup, been following along ...
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:27:55AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
> > reconsider this.
> >
> > I know that the gen
Hi,
On 11/18/20 2:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:40 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
>>> reconsider this.
>>>
>>> I know that the general rule of thumb is that DSDTs should not be overriden
>>> and ins
+Al, Prarit - FYI
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:27:55AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
> reconsider this.
>
> I know that the general rule of thumb is that DSDTs should not be overriden
> and instead the kernel shoul
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:40 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
> > reconsider this.
> >
> > I know that the general rule of thumb is that DSDTs should not be overriden
> > and instead the kernel should be made to "just work" with
> I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
> reconsider this.
>
> I know that the general rule of thumb is that DSDTs should not be overriden
> and instead the kernel should be made to "just work" with existing DSDTs
> even if they are buggy. And as someone who does a
Hi All,
I believe $subject has been discussed before but I would like to see us
reconsider this.
I know that the general rule of thumb is that DSDTs should not be overriden
and instead the kernel should be made to "just work" with existing DSDTs
even if they are buggy. And as someone who does a l
