From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672310552
Correct.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
From: Vladis Dronov on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672292721
indeed, so probably this MR should be made against the C9S tree and not the
ARK one...?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672276565
Right, but if it is still staged for rc1, it means that this tree will get it
via Linus Monday morning and there is no need for an MR at all.
From: Bob Peterson on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672260597
Hi Justin. I think I did something wrong. See comment above:
"The source branch is 12666 commits behind the target branch"
I'm going to close this MR and start over.
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1375#note_672242647
While it looks like this MR needs to be rebased against current os-build (we
rebase the tree after every upstream release), I am wondering if it is even
worth merging. If this is sc
